1. Muffler, K. & Ulber, R. Productive biofilms. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 146, 264 (2014).

   Google Scholar 

2. Jo, J., Price-Whelan, A. & Dietrich, L. E. P. Gradients and consequences of heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 593–607 (2022).

   Article 
   CAS 
   PubMed 
   PubMed Central 

   Google Scholar 

3. Halan, B., Buehler, K. & Schmid, A. Biofilms as living catalysts in continuous chemical syntheses. Trends Biotechnol. 30, 453–465 (2012).

   Article 
   CAS 
   PubMed 

   Google Scholar 

4. Schmeckebier, A., Zayed, A. & Ulber, R. Productive biofilms: from prokaryotic to eukaryotic systems. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 97, 3049–3064 (2022).

   Article 
   CAS 

   Google Scholar 

5. Rosche, B., Li, X. Z., Hauer, B., Schmid, A. & Buehler, K. Microbial biofilms: a concept for industrial catalysis? Trends Biotechnol. 27, 636–643 (2009).

   Article 
   CAS 

   Google Scholar 

6. Alvarez, A. L., Weyers, S. L., Goemann, H. M., Peyton, B. M. & Gardner, R. D. Microalgae, soil and plants: a critical review of microalgae as renewable resources for agriculture. Algal Res. 54, 102200 (2021).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

7. Nguyen, P. Q., Botyanszki, Z., Tay, P. K. R. & Joshi, N. S. Programmable biofilm-based materials from engineered curli nanofibres. Nat. Commun. 5, 4945 (2014).

   Article 
   CAS 
   PubMed 

   Google Scholar 

8. Park, H., Schwartzman, A. F., Tang, T.-C., Wang, L. & Lu, T. K. Ultra-lightweight living structural material for enhanced stiffness and environmental sensing. Mater. Today Bio 18, 100504 (2023).

   Article 
   CAS 
   PubMed 

   Google Scholar 

9. Karygianni, L., Ren, Z., Koo, H. & Thurnheer, T. Biofilm matrixome: extracellular components in structured microbial communities. Trends Microbiol. 28, 668–681 (2020).

   Article 
   CAS 
   PubMed 

   Google Scholar 

10. Flemming, H. C. et al. The biofilm matrix: multitasking in a shared space. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 70–86 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

11. Edwards, S. J. & Kjellerup, B. V. Applications of biofilms in bioremediation and biotransformation of persistent organic pollutants, pharmaceuticals/personal care products, and heavy metals. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 9909–9921 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

12. Härrer, D., Elreedy, A., Ali, R., Hille-Reichel, A. & Gescher, J. Probing the robustness of Geobacter sulfurreducens against fermentation hydrolysate for uses in bioelectrochemical systems. Bioresour. Technol. 369, 128363 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

13. Morgan-Sagastume, F. Biofilm development, activity and the modification of carrier material surface properties in moving-bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) for wastewater treatment. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol. 48, 439–470 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

14. Grießmeier, V., Wienhöfer, J., Horn, H. & Gescher, J. Assessing and modeling biocatalysis in field denitrification beds reveals key influencing factors for future constructions. Water Res. 188, 116467 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

15. Lepine, C., Christianson, L., Davidson, J. & Summerfelt, S. Woodchip bioreactors as treatment for recirculating aquaculture systems’ wastewater: a cost assessment of nitrogen removal. Aquacult. Eng. 83, 85–92 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

16. Rittmann, B. E. Biofilms, active substrata, and me. Water Res. 132, 135–145 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

17. Bruin, L. M. M., de, Kreuk, M. K., de, Roest, H. F. R., van der, Uijterlinde, C. & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Aerobic granular sludge technology: an alternative to activated sludge? Water Sci. Technol. 49, 1–7 (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

18. Tang, C. et al. Performance of high-loaded ANAMMOX UASB reactors containing granular sludge. Water Res. 45, 135–144 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

19. van de Graaf, A. A. et al. Anaerobic oxidation of ammonium is a biologically mediated process. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1246–1251 (1995).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

20. Liu, C. et al. Rapid formation of granules coupling n-DAMO and anammox microorganisms to remove nitrogen. Water Res. 194, 116963 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

21. Dorias, B., Hauber, G. & Baumann, P. in Biotechnology: Environmental Processes I Vol. 11, 2nd edn, Ch. 16 (eds Rehm, H.-J. & Reed, G.) (Wiley, 1999)

22. Wang, J., Liang, J., Ning, D., Zhang, T. & Wang, M. A review of biomass immobilization in anammox and partial nitrification/anammox systems: advances, issues, and future perspectives. Sci. Total. Environ. 821, 152792 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

23. Ebner, H., Sellmer, S. & Follmann, H. in Biotechnology: Products of Primary Metabolism 2nd edn, Ch. 12 (eds Rehm, H.‐J. & Reed, G.) 381–401 (Wiley, 1996).

24. König, H. in Biotechnology Set 2nd edn (eds Rehm, H.‐J. & Reed, G.) 249–264 (Wiley, 2001).

25. Yuan, Q., Jia, Z., Roots, P. & Wells, G. A strategy for fast anammox biofilm formation under mainstream conditions. Chemosphere 318, 137955 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

26. Riesenberg, D. & Guthke, R. High-cell-density cultivation of microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 51, 422–430 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

27. Shiloach, J. & Fass, R. Growing E. coli to high cell density—a historical perspective on method development. Biotechnol. Adv. 23, 345–357 (2005).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

28. Shukla, S. K., Manobala, T., Rao, T. S., Shukla, S. K. & Rao, T. S. in Immobilization Strategies (eds Tripathi, A. & Melo, J. S.) 535–555 (Springer, 2021).

29. Morgan-Sagastume, J. M. & Noyola, A. Evaluation of an aerobic submerged filter packed with volcanic scoria. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 2528–2536 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

30. Cuny, L. et al. Evaluation of productive biofilms for continuous lactic acid production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 116, 2687–2697 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

31. Zhang, Q. et al. Mechanical resilience of biofilms toward environmental perturbations mediated by extracellular matrix. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2110699 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

32. Ciofu, O., Moser, C., Jensen, P. Ø. & Høiby, N. Tolerance and resistance of microbial biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 621–635 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

33. Halan, B., Schmid, A. & Buehler, K. Real-time solvent tolerance analysis of Pseudomonas sp. strain VLB120ΔC catalytic biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microb. 77, 1563–1571 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

34. Mishra, S. et al. Biofilm-mediated bioremediation is a powerful tool for the removal of environmental pollutants. Chemosphere 294, 133609 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

35. Darmon, E. & Leach, D. R. F. Bacterial genome instability. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78, 1–39 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

36. Fraser, C., Alm, E. J., Polz, M. F., Spratt, B. G. & Hanage, W. P. The bacterial species challenge: making sense of genetic and ecological diversity. Science 323, 741–746 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

37. Tenaillon, O. et al. Tempo and mode of genome evolution in a 50,000-generation experiment. Nature 536, 165–170 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

38. Renda, B. A., Hammerling, M. J. & Barrick, J. E. Engineering reduced evolutionary potential for synthetic biology. Mol. BioSyst. 10, 1668–1678 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

39. Akeno, Y., Ying, B. W., Tsuru, S. & Yomo, T. A reduced genome decreases the host carrying capacity for foreign DNA. Microb. Cell Fact. 13, 49 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

40. Lieder, S., Nikel, P. I., Lorenzo, Vde & Takors, R. Genome reduction boosts heterologous gene expression in Pseudomonas putida. Microb. Cell Fact. 14, 23 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

41. Umenhoffer, K. et al. Reduced evolvability of Escherichia coli MDS42, an IS-less cellular chassis for molecular and synthetic biology applications. Microb. Cell Fact. 9, 38 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

42. Csörgo, B., Fehér, T., Tímár, E., Blattner, F. R. & Pósfai, G. Low-mutation-rate, reduced-genome Escherichia coli: an improved host for faithful maintenance of engineered genetic constructs. Microb. Cell Fact. 11, 11 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

43. Xia, Y. et al. Coupled CFD‐DEM modeling to predict how EPS affects bacterial biofilm deformation, recovery and detachment under flow conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 119, 2551 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

44. Lewandowski, Z. & Beyenal, H. Fundamentals of Biofilm Research (CRC Press, 2017).

45. Waharte, F., Steenkeste, K., Briandet, R. & Fontaine-Aupart, M. P. Diffusion measurements inside biofilms by image-based fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis with a commercial confocal laser scanning microscope. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 5860–5869 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

46. Axelrod, D., Koppel, D. E., Schlessinger, J., Elson, E. & Webb, W. W. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys. J. 16, 1055–1069 (1976).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

47. Hauth, J., Chodorski, J., Wirsen, A. & Ulber, R. Improved FRAP measurements on biofilms. Biophys. J. 118, 2354–2365 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

48. van den Berg, L., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. & de Kreuk, M. K. How to measure diffusion coefficients in biofilms: a critical analysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 118, 1273–1285 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

49. Kumar, A. et al. Enhanced CO₂ fixation and biofuel production via microalgae: recent developments and future directions. Trends Biotechnol. 28, 371–380 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

50. Lee, S. H. et al. Higher biomass productivity of microalgae in an attached growth system, using wastewater. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, 1566–1573 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

51. Scherer, K., Stiefelmaier, J., Strieth, D., Wahl, M. & Ulber, R. Development of a lightweight multi-skin sheet photobioreactor for future cultivation of phototrophic biofilms on facades. J. Biotechnol. 320, 28–35 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

52. Al-Kaidy, H. et al. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering – from the first Ullmann’s article to recent trends. ChemBioEng Rev. 2, 175–184 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

53. Kashid, M. N., Harshe, Y. M. & Agar, D. W. Liquid–liquid slug flow in a capillary: an alternative to suspended drop or film contactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 8420–8430 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

54. Karande, R., Halan, B., Schmid, A. & Buehler, K. Segmented flow is controlling growth of catalytic biofilms in continuous multiphase microreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111, 1831–1840 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

55. Gross, R., Buehler, K. & Schmid, A. Engineered catalytic biofilms for continuous large scale production of n-octanol and (S)-styrene oxide. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 110, 424–436 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

56. Hoschek, A. et al. Mixed-species biofilms for high-cell-density application of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in capillary reactors for continuous cyclohexane oxidation to cyclohexanol. Bioresour. Technol. 282, 171–178 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

57. Dong, H., Zhang, W., Zhou, S., Ying, H. & Wang, P. Rational design of artificial biofilms as sustainable supports for whole-cell catalysis through integrating extra- and intracellular catalysis. ChemSusChem 15, e202200850 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

58. Gunes, B. A critical review on biofilm-based reactor systems for enhanced syngas fermentation processes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 143, 110950 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

59. Sun, X., Atiyeh, H. K., Huhnke, R. L. & Tanner, R. S. Syngas fermentation process development for production of biofuels and chemicals: a review. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 7, 100279 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

60. Stoll, I. K. et al. The complex way to sustainability: petroleum-based processes versus biosynthetic pathways in the formation of c4 chemicals from syngas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 15863–15871 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

61. Zhang, F. et al. Fatty acids production from hydrogen and carbon dioxide by mixed culture in the membrane biofilm reactor. Water Res. 47, 6122–6129 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

62. Mohammadi, M. et al. Bioconversion of synthesis gas to second generation biofuels: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 4255–4273 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

63. Riegler, P. et al. Continuous conversion of CO₂/H₂ with Clostridium aceticum in biofilm reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 291, 121760 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

64. Ning, X. et al. Emerging bioelectrochemical technologies for biogas production and upgrading in cascading circular bioenergy systems. iScience 24, 102998 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

65. Chavez, B. A., Raghavan, V. & Tartakovsky, B. A comparative analysis of biopolymer production by microbial and bioelectrochemical technologies. RSC Adv. 12, 16105–16118 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

66. Ahmad, A., Priyadarshani, M., Das, S. & Ghangrekar, M. M. Role of bioelectrochemical systems for the remediation of emerging contaminants from wastewater: a review. J. Basic. Microbiol. 62, 201–222 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

67. Roy, M., Aryal, N., Zhang, Y., Patil, S. A. & Pant, D. Technological progress and readiness level of microbial electrosynthesis and electrofermentation for carbon dioxide and organic wastes valorization. Curr. Opin. Green. Sustain. Chem. 35, 100605 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

68. Conners, E. M., Rengasamy, K. & Bose, A. Electroactive biofilms: how microbial electron transfer enables bioelectrochemical applications. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 49, 12 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

69. Hackbarth, M. et al. Monitoring and quantification of bioelectrochemical Kyrpidia spormannii biofilm development in a novel flow cell setup. Chem. Eng. J. 390, 124604 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

70. Renslow, R. S. et al. Metabolic spatial variability in electrode-respiring Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1827–1836 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

71. Lichtervelde, A. C. L., de, Heijne, A., ter, Hamelers, H. V. M., Biesheuvel, P. M. & Dykstra, J. E. Theory of ion and electron transport coupled with biochemical conversions in an electroactive biofilm. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 014018 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

72. Fujikawa, T. et al. Unexpected genomic features of high current density-producing Geobacter sulfurreducens strain YM18. Fems. Microbiol. Lett. 368, fnab119 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

73. Jiang, X. et al. Probing single- to multi-cell level charge transport in Geobacter sulfurreducens DL-1. Nat. Commun. 4, 2751 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

74. Liu, X., Walker, D. J. F., Nonnenmann, S. S., Sun, D. & Lovley, D. R. Direct observation of electrically conductive pili emanating from Geobacter sulfurreducens. mBio 12, e02209–e02221 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

75. Gu, Y. et al. Structure of Geobacter pili reveals secretory rather than nanowire behaviour. Nature 597, 430–434 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

76. Philipp, L.-A., Edel, M. & Gescher, J. Chapter one genetic engineering for enhanced productivity in bioelectrochemical systems. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 111, 1–31 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

77. Lovley, D. R. Powering microbes with electricity: direct electron transfer from electrodes to microbes. Env. Microbiol. Rep. 3, 27–35 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

78. Edel, M., Horn, H. & Gescher, J. Biofilm systems as tools in biotechnological production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 103, 5095–5103 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

79. Jourdin, L., Sousa, J., van Stralen, N. & Strik, D. P. B. T. B. Techno-economic assessment of microbial electrosynthesis from CO₂ and/or organics: an interdisciplinary roadmap towards future research and application. Appl. Energ. 279, 115775 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

80. Prévoteau, A., Carvajal-Arroyo, J. M., Ganigué, R. & Rabaey, K. Microbial electrosynthesis from CO₂: forever a promise? Curr. Opin. Biotech. 62, 48–57 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

81. Walter, X. A. et al. From the lab to the field: self-stratifying microbial fuel cells stacks directly powering lights. Appl. Energ. 277, 115514 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

82. Cao, B. et al. Silver nanoparticles boost charge-extraction efficiency in Shewanella microbial fuel cells. Science 373, 1336–1340 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

83. Wang, D. et al. Surface modification of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 with polypyrrole-dopamine coating for improvement of power generation in microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 483, 229220 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

84. Knoll, M. T., Fuderer, E. & Gescher, J. Sprayable biofilm—agarose hydrogels as 3D matrix for enhanced productivity in bioelectrochemical systems. Biofilm 4, 100077 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

85. Krieg, T., Sydow, A., Schröder, U., Schrader, J. & Holtmann, D. Reactor concepts for bioelectrochemical syntheses and energy conversion. Trends Biotechnol. 32, 645–655 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

86. Kerzenmacher, S. Engineering of microbial electrodes. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 167, 135–180 (2017).

87. Asensio, Y. et al. Upgrading fluidized bed bioelectrochemical reactors for treating brewery wastewater by using a fluid-like electrode. Chem. Eng. J. 406, 127103 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

88. Hackbarth, M., Gescher, J., Horn, H. & Reiner, J. E. A scalable, rotating disc bioelectrochemical reactor (RDBER) suitable for the cultivation of both cathodic and anodic biofilms. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 21, 101357 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

89. Nerenberg, R. The membrane-biofilm reactor (MBfR) as a counter-diffusional biofilm process. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 38, 131–136 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

90. Martin, K. J. & Nerenberg, R. The membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) for water and wastewater treatment: principles, applications, and recent developments. Bioresour. Technol. 122, 83–94 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

91. Elisiário, M. P., Wever, H. D., Hecke, W. V., Noorman, H. & Straathof, A. J. J. Membrane bioreactors for syngas permeation and fermentation. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 42, 856–872 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

92. Yasin, M. et al. Microbial synthesis gas utilization and ways to resolve kinetic and mass-transfer limitations. Bioresour. Technol. 177, 361–374 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

93. Asimakopoulos, K., Gavala, H. N. & Skiadas, I. V. Reactor systems for syngas fermentation processes: a review. Chem. Eng. J. 348, 732–744 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

94. Dong, K. et al. Nitrogen removal from nitrate-containing wastewaters in hydrogen-based membrane biofilm reactors via hydrogen autotrophic denitrification: biofilm structure, microbial community and optimization strategies. Front. Microbiol. 13, 924084 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

95. Nangle, S. N. et al. Valorization of CO₂ through lithoautotrophic production of sustainable chemicals in Cupriavidus necator. Metab. Eng. 62, 207–220 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

96. Windhorst, C. & Gescher, J. Efficient biochemical production of acetoin from carbon dioxide using Cupriavidus necator H16. Biotechnol. Biofuels 12, 163 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

97. Stiefelmaier, J. et al. Characterization of terrestrial phototrophic biofilms of cyanobacterial species. Algal Res. 50, 101996 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

98. Bolhuis, H., Cretoiu, M. S. & Stal, L. J. Molecular ecology of microbial mats. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 90, 335–350 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

99. Angermayr, S. A., Rovira, A. G. & Hellingwerf, K. J. Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for the synthesis of commodity products. Trends Biotechnol. 33, 352–361 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

100. Fisher, M. L., Allen, R., Luo, Y. & Curtiss, R. Export of extracellular polysaccharides modulates adherence of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis. PLoS One 8, e74514 (2013).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

101. Agostoni, M., Waters, C. M. & Montgomery, B. L. Regulation of biofilm formation and cellular buoyancy through modulating intracellular cyclic di-GMP levels in engineered cyanobacteria. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 113, 311–319 (2016).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

102. Rosenbaum, M., He, Z. & Angenent, L. T. Light energy to bioelectricity: photosynthetic microbial fuel cells. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21, 259–264 (2010).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

103. Obileke, K. C., Onyeaka, H., Meyer, E. L. & Nwokolo, N. Microbial fuel cells, a renewable energy technology for bio-electricity generation: a mini-review. Electrochem. Commun. 125, 107003 (2021).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

104. Tschörtner, J., Lai, B. & Krömer, J. O. Biophotovoltaics: green power generation from sunlight and water. Front. Microbiol. 10, 866 (2019).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

105. McCormick, A. J. et al. Photosynthetic biofilms in pure culture harness solar energy in a mediatorless bio-photovoltaic cell (BPV) system. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 4699–4709 (2011).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

106. Miranda, A. F. et al. Applications of microalgal biofilms for wastewater treatment and bioenergy production. Biotechnol. Biofuels 10, 1–23 (2017).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

107. Kollmen, J. & Strieth, D. The beneficial effects of cyanobacterial co-culture on plant growth. Life 12, 223 (2022).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

108. Mutale-Joan, C., Sbabou, L. & Hicham, E. A. Microalgae and cyanobacteria: how exploiting these microbial resources can address the underlying challenges related to food sources and sustainable agriculture: a review. J. Plant. Growth Regul. 42, 1–20 (2022).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

109. Stirk, W. A., Ördög, V., Staden, J. V. & Jäger, K. Cytokinin- and auxin-like activity in Cyanophyta and microalgae. J. Appl. Phycol. 14, 215–221 (2002).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

110. Han, X., Zeng, H., Bartocci, P., Fantozzi, F. & Yan, Y. Phytohormones and effects on growth and metabolites of microalgae: a review. Fermentation 4, 25 (2018).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

111. Shariatmadari, Z., Riahi, H., Hashtroudi, M. S., Ghassempour, A. R. & Aghashariatmadary, Z. Plant growth promoting cyanobacteria and their distribution in terrestrial habitats of Iran. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. 59, 535–547 (2013).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

112. Kumar, G., Teli, B., Mukherjee, A., Bajpai, R. & Sarma, B. K. in Secondary Metabolites of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizomicroorganisms (eds Singh, H., Keswani, C., Reddy, M., Sansinenea, E. & García-Estrada, C.) 239–252 (Springer, 2019).

113. Irisarri, P., Gonnet, S. & Monza, J. Cyanobacteria in Uruguayan rice fields: diversity, nitrogen fixing ability and tolerance to herbicides and combined nitrogen. J. Biotechnol. 91, 95–103 (2001).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

114. Prasanna, R., Joshi, M., Rana, A., Shivay, Y. S. & Nain, L. Influence of co-inoculation of bacteria-cyanobacteria on crop yield and C–N sequestration in soil under rice crop. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28, 1223–1235 (2012).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

115. Roeselers, G., Loosdrecht, M. C. M. V. & Muyzer, G. Phototrophic biofilms and their potential applications. J. Appl. Phycol. 20, 227–235 (2008).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

116. Fischer, S. E., Fischer, S. I., Magris, S. & Mori, G. B. Isolation and characterization of bacteria from the rhizosphere of wheat. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23, 895–903 (2007).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

117. Karthikeyan, N., Prasanna, R., Nain, L. & Kaushik, B. D. Evaluating the potential of plant growth promoting cyanobacteria as inoculants for wheat. Eur. J. Soil. Biol. 43, 23–30 (2007).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

118. Grzesik, M., Romanowska-Duda, Z. & Kalaji, H. M. Effectiveness of cyanobacteria and green algae in enhancing the photosynthetic performance and growth of willow (Salix viminalis L.) plants under limited synthetic fertilizers application. Photosynthetica 55, 510–521 (2017).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

119. Saadatnia, H. & Riahi, H. Cyanobacteria from paddy fields in Iran as a biofertilizer in rice plants. Plant. Soil. Env. 55, 207–212 (2009).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

120. Coppens, J. et al. The use of microalgae as a high-value organic slow-release fertilizer results in tomatoes with increased carotenoid and sugar levels. J. Appl. Phycol. 28, 2367–2377 (2016).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

121. Maqubela, M. P., Mnkeni, P. N. S., Issa, O. M., Pardo, M. T. & D’Acqui, L. P. Nostoc cyanobacterial inoculation in South African agricultural soils enhances soil structure, fertility, and maize growth. Plant. Soil. 315, 79–92 (2009).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

122. Prasanna, R. et al. Cyanobacteria-based bioinoculants influence growth and yields by modulating the microbial communities favourably in the rhizospheres of maize hybrids. Eur. J. Soil. Biol. 75, 15–23 (2016).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

123. Fedeson, D. T. & Ducat, D. C. Cyanobacterial surface display system mediates engineered interspecies and abiotic binding. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 367–374 (2017).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

124. Cengic, I., Uhlén, M. & Hudson, E. P. Surface display of small affinity proteins on Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 mediated by fusion to the major type IV pilin PilA1. J. Bacteriol. 200, e00270–e00318 (2018).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

125. Quoc, B. N. et al. An investigation into the optimal granular sludge size for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphate removal. Water Res. 198, 117119 (2021).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

126. Bathe, S., Kreuk, M. de, McSwain, B. & Schwarzenbeck, N. (eds) Aerobic Granular Sludge (IWA Publishing, 2015).

127. Ghosh, S. & Chakraborty, S. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) from aerobic granules of refinery sludge and Micrococcus aloeverae strain SG002 cultivated in oily wastewater. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 155, 105091 (2020).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

128. Bahgat, N. T., Wilfert, P., Korving, L. & Loosdrecht, Mvan Integrated resource recovery from aerobic granular sludge plants. Water Res. 234, 119819 (2023).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

129. Nancharaiah, Y. V. & Reddy, G. K. K. Aerobic granular sludge technology: mechanisms of granulation and biotechnological applications. Bioresour. Technol. 247, 1128–1143 (2018).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

130. Jiang, Q. et al. Current progress, challenges and perspectives in the microalgal-bacterial aerobic granular sludge process: a review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 19, 13950 (2022).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

131. Chen, A. Y. et al. Synthesis and patterning of tunable multiscale materials with engineered cells. Nat. Mater. 13, 515–523 (2014).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

132. Cheng, K.-C., Catchmark, J. M. & Demirci, A. Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using a biofilm reactor and its material property analysis. J. Biol. Eng. 3, 12 (2009).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

133. Lee, Y. S. & Park, W. Current challenges and future directions for bacterial self-healing concrete. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102, 3059–3070 (2018).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

134. Dhami, N. K., Reddy, S. M. & Mukherjee, A. in Advanced Topics in Biomineralization (ed. Seto, J.) 137–164 (InTechOpen, 2012).

135. Saracho, A. C. et al. Controlling the calcium carbonate microstructure of engineered living building materials. J. Mater. Chem. A. 9, 24438–24451 (2021).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

136. Little, B. J., Hinks, J. & Blackwood, D. J. Microbially influenced corrosion: towards an interdisciplinary perspective on mechanisms. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 154, 105062 (2020).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

137. Zuo, R., Kus, E., Mansfeld, F. & Wood, T. K. The importance of live biofilms in corrosion protection. Corros. Sci. 47, 279–287 (2005).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

138. Liu, T. et al. Marine bacteria provide lasting anticorrosion activity for steel via biofilm-induced mineralization. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 10, 40317–40327 (2018).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

139. Li, Z. et al. Marine biofilms with significant corrosion inhibition performance by secreting extracellular polymeric substances. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 13, 47272–47282 (2021).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

140. Karande, R. et al. Continuous cyclohexane oxidation to cyclohexanol using a novel cytochrome P450 monooxygenase from Acidovorax sp. CHX100 in recombinant P. taiwanensis VLB120 biofilms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 113, 52–61 (2016).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

141. Gross, R., Hauer, B., Otto, K. & Schmid, A. Microbial biofilms: new catalysts for maximizing productivity of long‐term biotransformations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 98, 1123–1134 (2007).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

142. Yang, G., Mai, Q., Zhuang, Z. & Zhuang, L. Buffer capacity regulates the stratification of anode-respiring biofilm during brewery wastewater treatment. Environ. Res. 201, 111572 (2021).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

143. Flemming, H. C. & Wuertz, S. Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 247–260 (2019).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

144. Penesyan, A., Paulsen, I. T., Kjelleberg, S. & Gillings, M. R. Three faces of biofilms: a microbial lifestyle, a nascent multicellular organism, and an incubator for diversity. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 80 (2021).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

145. Sauer, K. et al. The biofilm life cycle: expanding the conceptual model of biofilm formation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 608–620 (2022).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

146. Cai, Y. M. Non-surface attached bacterial aggregates: a ubiquitous third lifestyle. Front. Microbiol. 11, 3106 (2020).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

147. Valentini, M. & Filloux, A. Biofilms and cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) signaling: lessons from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 12547–12555 (2016).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

148. Baker, A. E. et al. Flagellar stators stimulate c-di-GMP production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 201, e00741–e00818 (2019).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

149. Webster, S. S., Lee, C. K., Schmidt, W. C., Wong, G. C. L. & O’Toole, G. A. Interaction between the type 4 pili machinery and a diguanylate cyclase fine-tune c-di-GMP levels during early biofilm formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2105566118 (2021).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

150. Baker, A. E. et al. PilZ domain protein FlgZ mediates cyclic di-GMP-dependent swarming motility control in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 198, 1837–1846 (2016).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

151. Thormann, K. M. Dynamic hybrid flagellar motors—fuel switch and more. Front. Microbiol. 13, 867 (2022).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

152. Gerven, N. V., Klein, R. D., Hultgren, S. J. & Remaut, H. Bacterial amyloid formation: structural insights into curli biogensis. Trends Microbiol. 23, 693–706 (2015).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

153. Mukherjee, S. & Bassler, B. L. Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 371–382 (2019).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

154. Paula, A. J., Hwang, G. & Koo, H. Dynamics of bacterial population growth in biofilms resemble spatial and structural aspects of urbanization. Nat. Commun. 11, 1354 (2020).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

155. Blauert, F., Horn, H. & Wagner, M. Time‐resolved biofilm deformation measurements using optical coherence tomography. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 112, 1893–1905 (2015).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

156. Rumbaugh, K. P. & Sauer, K. Biofilm dispersion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 571–586 (2020).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

157. Moore-Ott, J. A., Chiu, S., Amchin, D. B., Bhattacharjee, T. & Datta, S. S. A biophysical threshold for biofilm formation. eLife 11, e76380 (2022).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

Download references