1. Parker, K. et al. Demographic and Economic Trends in Urban, Suburban and Rural Communities (Pew Research Center, 2018).

2. Pickett, S. T. A. et al. A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst. 1, 185–199 (1997).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

3. Grimm, N. B. et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319, 756–760 (2008).

   Article 
   CAS 
   PubMed 

   Google Scholar 

4. Locke, D. H. & Baine, G. The good, the bad, and the interested: how historical demographics explain present-day tree canopy, vacant lot and tree request spatial variability in New Haven, CT. Urban Ecosyst. 18, 391–409 (2015).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

5. Locke, D. H. et al. Residential housing segregation and urban tree canopy in 37 US Cities. npj Urban Sustain https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00022-0 (2021).

6. Schell, C. J. et al. The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments. Science 369, eaay4497 (2020).

   Article 
   CAS 

   Google Scholar 

7. Massey, D. S. & Denton, N. A. The dimensions of residential segregation. Soc. Forces 67, 281 (1988).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

8. Logan, J. R. Growth, politics, and the stratification of places. Am. J. Sociol. 84, 404–416 (1978).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

9. Logan, J. R. & Molotch, H. L. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (Univ. of California Press, 1987).

10. Morello-Frosch, R. A. Discrimination and the political economy of environmental inequality. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 20, 477–496 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

11. Woods, L. L. The federal home loan bank board, redlining, and the national proliferation of racial lending discrimination, 1921–1950. J. Urban Hist. 38, 1036–1059 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

12. Hope, D. et al. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8788–8792 (2003).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

13. Schwarz, K. et al. Trees grow on money: urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLoS ONE 10, e0122051 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

14. Rigolon, A. A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 153, 160–169 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

15. Leong, M., Dunn, R. R. & Trautwein, M. D. Biodiversity and socioeconomics in the city: a review of the luxury effect. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180082 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

16. Rigolon, A., Browning, M. & Jennings, V. Inequities in the quality of urban park systems: an environmental justice investigation of cities in the United States. Landsc. Urban Plan. 178, 156–169 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

17. Kuras, E. R. et al. Urban socioeconomic inequality and biodiversity often converge, but not always: a global meta-analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 198, 103799 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

18. Kinzig, A. P., Warren, P., Martin, C., Hope, D. & Katti, M. The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecol. Soc. 10, art23 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

19. Lerman, S. B. & Warren, P. S. The conservation value of residential yards: linking birds and people. Ecol. Appl. 21, 1327–1339 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

20. Hammer, M. S., Swinburn, T. K. & Neitzel, R. L. Environmental noise pollution in the United States: developing an effective public health response. Environ. Health Perspect. 122, 115–119 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

21. Shannon, G. et al. A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife: effects of anthropogenic noise on wildlife. Biol. Rev. 91, 982–1005 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

22. Barber, J. R., Crooks, K. R. & Fristrup, K. M. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 180–189 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

23. The Urban Noise Survey (US Environmental Protection Agency, 1977).

24. Casey, J. A. et al. Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, residential segregation, and spatial variation in noise exposure in the contiguous United States. Environ. Health Perspect. 125, 077017 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

25. Collins, T. W., Grineski, S. E. & Nadybal, S. Social disparities in exposure to noise at public schools in the contiguous United States. Environ. Res. 175, 257–265 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

26. Collins, T. W., Nadybal, S. & Grineski, S. E. Sonic injustice: disparate residential exposures to transport noise from road and aviation sources in the continental United States. J. Transp. Geogr. 82, 102604 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

27. Ray, M. Environmental justice: segregation, noise pollution and health disparities near the Hartsfield–Jackson Airport area in Atlanta. Rev. Black Polit. Econ. 50, 18–34 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

28. Kight, C. R. & Swaddle, J. P. How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review: environmental noise and animals. Ecol. Lett. 14, 1052–1061 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

29. Senzaki, M. et al. Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent. Nature 587, 605–609 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

30. Read, J., Jones, G. & Radford, A. N. Fitness costs as well as benefits are important when considering responses to anthropogenic noise. Behav. Ecol. 25, 4–7 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

31. Simpson, S. D. et al. Anthropogenic noise increases fish mortality by predation. Nat. Commun. 7, 10544 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

32. Kunc, H. P. & Schmidt, R. The effects of anthropogenic noise on animals: a meta-analysis. Biol. Lett. 15, 20190649 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

33. Mitchell, B. & Franco, J. HOLC and ‘Redlining’ Maps: The Persistent Structure of Segregation and Economic Inequality (NCRC, 2018).

34. 2018 National Transportation Noise Map Dataset (US Department of Transportation, 2020).

35. Ising, H. & Braun, C. Acute and chronic endocrine effects of noise: review of the research conducted at the Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene. Noise Health 2, 7 (2000).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

36. What Noises Cause Hearing Loss? (National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022).

37. Nega, T. H., Chihara, L., Smith, K. & Jayaraman, M. Traffic noise and inequality in the Twin Cities, Minnesota. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 19, 601–619 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

38. Huang, Y.-K., Mitchell, U. A., Conroy, L. M. & Jones, R. M. Community daytime noise pollution and socioeconomic differences in Chicago, IL. PLoS ONE 16, e0254762 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

39. White, K. & Borrell, L. N. Racial/ethnic residential segregation: framing the context of health risk and health disparities. Health Place 17, 438–448 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

40. Lam, K. & Chan, P.-K. Socio-economic status and inequalities in exposure to transportation noise in Hong Kong. Open Environ. Sci. 2, 107–113 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

41. Dale, L. M. et al. Socioeconomic status and environmental noise exposure in Montreal, Canada. BMC Public Health 15, 205 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

42. Brainard, J. S., Jones, A. P., Bateman, I. J. & Lovett, A. A. Exposure to environmental urban noise pollution in Birmingham, UK. Urban Stud. 41, 2581–2600 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

43. Lakes, T., Brückner, M. & Krämer, A. Development of an environmental justice index to determine socio-economic disparities of noise pollution and green space in residential areas in Berlin. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 57, 538–556 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

44. Buxton, R. T. et al. Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas. Science 356, 531–533 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

45. Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues (Federal Interagency Committee on Noise, 1992).

46. Davies, H. W., Vlaanderen, J. J., Henderson, S. B. & Brauer, M. Correlation between co-exposures to noise and air pollution from traffic sources. Occup. Environ. Med. 66, 347–350 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

47. Ross, Z. et al. Noise, air pollutants and traffic: continuous measurement and correlation at a high-traffic location in New York City. Environ. Res. 111, 1054–1063 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

48. Eglington, S. M., Noble, D. G. & Fuller, R. J. A meta-analysis of spatial relationships in species richness across taxa: birds as indicators of wider biodiversity in temperate regions. J. Nat. Conserv. 20, 301–309 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

49. Gasc, A., Francomano, D., Dunning, J. B. & Pijanowski, B. C. Future directions for soundscape ecology: the importance of ornithological contributions. Auk 134, 215–228 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

50. White, M. E., Hamlin, I., Butler, C. W. & Richardson, M. The joy of birds: the effect of rating for joy or counting garden bird species on wellbeing, anxiety, and nature connection. Urban Ecosyst. 26, 755–765 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

51. Morley, E. L., Jones, G. & Radford, A. N. The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20132683 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

52. Jerem, P. & Mathews, F. Trends and knowledge gaps in field research investigating effects of anthropogenic noise. Conserv. Biol. 35, 115–129 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

53. Baker, K., Eichhorn, M. P. & Griffiths, M. Decolonizing field ecology. Biotropica 51, 288–292 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

54. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

55. Pollock, L. J., Thuiller, W. & Jetz, W. Large conservation gains possible for global biodiversity facets. Nature 546, 141–144 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

56. Seto, K. C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B. & Reilly, M. K. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE 6, e23777 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

57. Hu, Y. & Cardoso, G. C. Are bird species that vocalize at higher frequencies preadapted to inhabit noisy urban areas? Behav. Ecol. 20, 1268–1273 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

58. Rheindt, F. E. The impact of roads on birds: does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? J. Ornithol. 144, 295–306 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

59. Francis, C. D., Paritsis, J., Ortega, C. P. & Cruz, A. Landscape patterns of avian habitat use and nest success are affected by chronic gas well compressor noise. Landsc. Ecol. 26, 1269–1280 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

60. Slabbekoorn, H. & Ripmeester, E. A. P. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Mol. Ecol. 17, 72–83 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

61. Lowry, H., Lill, A. & Wong, B. B. M. How noisy does a noisy miner have to be? Amplitude adjustments of alarm calls in an avian urban ‘adapter’. PLoS ONE 7, e29960 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

62. Hage, S. R., Jiang, T., Berquist, S. W., Feng, J. & Metzner, W. Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4063–4068 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

63. Fuller, R. A., Warren, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biol. Lett. 3, 368–370 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

64. Song, S. et al. Bats adjust temporal parameters of echolocation pulses but not those of communication calls in response to traffic noise. Integr. Zool. 14, 576–588 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

65. Francis, C. D. & Barber, J. R. A framework for understanding noise impacts on wildlife: an urgent conservation priority. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 305–313 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

66. Dominoni, D. M. et al. Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 502–511 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

67. Duarte, M. H. L., Vecci, M. A., Hirsch, A. & Young, R. J. Noisy human neighbours affect where urban monkeys live. Biol. Lett. 7, 840–842 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

68. Lehrer, E. W. et al. Urban bat occupancy is highly influenced by noise and the location of water: considerations for nature-based urban planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 210, 104063 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

69. Kok, A. C. M. et al. How chronic anthropogenic noise can affect wildlife communities. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11, 1130075 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

70. Francis, C. D., Ortega, C. P. & Cruz, A. Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions. Curr. Biol. 19, 1415–1419 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

71. Guenat, S. & Dallimer, M. A global meta‐analysis reveals contrasting impacts of air, light, and noise pollution on pollination. Ecol. Evol. 13, e9990 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

72. Phillips, J. N., Termondt, S. E. & Francis, C. D. Long-term noise pollution affects seedling recruitment and community composition, with negative effects persisting after removal. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 288, 20202906 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

73. Grove, M. et al. The legacy effect: understanding how segregation and environmental injustice unfold over time in Baltimore. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 108, 524–537 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

74. Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 3, 390–394 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

75. Carrus, G. et al. Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 134, 221–228 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

76. Marselle, M. R., Irvine, K. N., Lorenzo-Arribas, A. & Warber, S. L. Does perceived restorativeness mediate the effects of perceived biodiversity and perceived naturalness on emotional well-being following group walks in nature? J. Environ. Psychol. 46, 217–232 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

77. Wolf, L. J., Zu Ermgassen, S., Balmford, A., White, M. & Weinstein, N. Is variety the spice of life? An experimental investigation into the effects of species richness on self-reported mental well-being. PLoS ONe 12, e0170225 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

78. Cox, D. T. C. et al. Doses of neighborhood nature: the benefits for mental health of living with nature. BioScience https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw173 (2017).

79. Franco, L. S., Shanahan, D. F. & Fuller, R. A. A review of the benefits of nature experiences: more than meets the eye. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 14, 864 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

80. Buxton, R. T., Pearson, A. L., Allou, C., Fristrup, K. & Wittemyer, G. A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2013097118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

81. Uebel, K., Marselle, M., Dean, A. J., Rhodes, J. R. & Bonn, A. Urban green space soundscapes and their perceived restorativeness. People Nat. 3, 756–769 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

82. Levenhagen, M. J. et al. Ecosystem services enhanced through soundscape management link people and wildlife. People Nat. 3, 176–189 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

83. Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

84. Dirzo, R. et al. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345, 401–406 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

85. Turo, K. J. & Gardiner, M. M. The balancing act of urban conservation. Nat. Commun. 11, 3773 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

86. Investing in Equitable Urban Park Systems: Case Studies and Recommendations (City Parks Alliance, 2022).

87. 2021 Game Plan for a Healthy City (City of Denver Parks and Recreation, 2022).

88. Anguelovski, I. et al. Green gentrification in European and North American cities. Nat. Commun. 13, 3816 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

89. Nelson, R., Winling, L., Marciano, R., Connolly, N. B. D. & Ayers, N. Mapping Inequality: Redlining in New Deal America (Mapbox, OpenStreetMap, 2019); https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redlining/

90. Sears, C. G. et al. The association of traffic-related air and noise pollution with maternal blood pressure and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the HOME study cohort. Environ. Int. 121, 574–581 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

91. The R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).

92. McKenna, M., Shannon, G. & Fristrup, K. Characterizing anthropogenic noise to improve understanding and management of impacts to wildlife. Endanger. Species Res. 31, 279–291 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

93. Berglund, B., Hassmén, P. & Job, R. F. S. Sources and effects of low‐frequency noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 2985–3002 (1996).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

94. Ellis-Soto, D., Chapman, M. & Locke, D. Uneven biodiversity sampling across redlined urban areas in the United States. Preprint at EcoRxiv https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/ex6w2 (2022).

95. Haddaway, N. R., Woodcock, P., Macura, B. & Collins, A. Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews: making literature reviews more reliable. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1596–1605 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

96. Bombaci, S. et al. Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s4mw6m998 (2023).

97. Bombaci, S. et al. Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7843664 (2023).

98. Rothstein, R. The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How our Government Segregated America (Liveright, 2017).

99. Peet, R. Class struggle, the relocation of employment, and economic crisis. Sci. Soc. 48, 38–51 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

100. Walker, R. in Social Relations and Spatial Structures (eds Gregory, D. & Urry, J.) 164–189 (Macmillan, 1985).

101. Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites (United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice, 1987).

102. Bullard, R. D. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality (Routledge, 2018).

103. HOLC Maps (National Community Reinvestment Coalition, 2017); http://maps.ncrc.org/holc

104. Hendricks, M. D. & Van Zandt, S. Unequal protection revisited: planning for environmental justice, hazard vulnerability, and critical infrastructure in communities of color. Environ. Justice 14, 87–97 (2021).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

105. Nardone, A., Rudolph, K. E., Morello-Frosch, R. & Casey, J. A. Redlines and greenspace: the relationship between historical redlining and 2010 greenspace across the United States. Environ. Health Perspect. 129, 017006 (2021).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

106. Nowak, D. J., Greenfield, E. J., Hoehn, R. E. & Lapoint, E. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environ. Pollut. 178, 229–236 (2013).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

107. Nowak, D. J., Hirabayashi, S., Bodine, A. & Greenfield, E. Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environ. Pollut. 193, 119–129 (2014).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

108. Sun, R. & Chen, L. Effects of green space dynamics on urban heat islands: mitigation and diversification. Ecosyst. Serv. 23, 38–46 (2017).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

109. Pulido, L. Rethinking environmental racism: white privilege and urban development in southern California. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 90, 12–40 (2000).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

110. Pastor, M., Sadd, J. & Hipp, J. Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move-in, and environmental justice. J. Urban Aff. 23, 1–21 (2001).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

111. Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M. & Sadd, J. Environmental justice and southern California’s ‘riskscape’: the distribution of air toxics exposures and health risks among diverse communities. Urban Aff. Rev. 36, 551–578 (2001).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

112. Williams, D. R. & Collins, C. Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Rep. 116, 404–416 (2001).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

113. Subramanian, S. V., Acevedo-Garcia, D. & Osypuk, T. L. Racial residential segregation and geographic heterogeneity in black/white disparity in poor self-rated health in the US: a multilevel statistical analysis. Soc. Sci. Med. 60, 1667–1679 (2005).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

114. Hayanga, A. J., Zeliadt, S. B. & Backhus, L. M. Residential segregation and lung cancer mortality in the United States. JAMA Surg. 148, 37 (2013).

     Article 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

115. Kershaw, K. N. & Albrecht, S. S. Racial/ethnic residential segregation and cardiovascular disease risk. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 9, 10 (2015).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

116. Nardone, A., Chiang, J. & Corburn, J. Historic redlining and urban health today in US cities. Environ. Justice 13, 109–119 (2020).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

117. Nardone, A. et al. Associations between historical residential redlining and current age-adjusted rates of emergency department visits due to asthma across eight cities in California: an ecological study. Lancet Planet. Health 4, e24–e31 (2020).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

Download references