The construct of ocean identity provides a valuable lens that can unpack the multiple dimensions of human connections with ocean spaces, and crucially places importance on the integration of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components. The construct of ocean identity is applicable in academic and professional contexts, and is largely unexplored from both qualitative and quantitative research perspectives. This comment article presents a revised definition of ocean identity and posits a useful conceptual framework based on a robust analysis of literature to unveil the multiple dimensions that may explain an individuals’ ocean identity. Here we identify a series of attributes that could be considered possible explanatory attributes of the emerging concept of ocean identity. Future research will statistically test the concepts presented here to validate a scale for measuring ocean identity. This piece contributes to the ongoing ocean literacy discourse and deepens our understanding of the multiple conceptual dimensions of ocean identity.
Introducing ocean identity as an emerging construct
Do you have ocean objects in your home that you adore? Do you vacation on or by the ocean regularly? Do you feel desire to be close to ocean spaces? If so, these may be expressions of your ocean identity. Jaksha1 defines ocean identity as how people view themselves specifically in relation to an ocean environment. In exploring the construct with K-12 students they explain that ocean identity “takes into account non-traditional variables in education such as how students talk about relationships with non-human species, how values and life goals relate to the environment, and emotions expressed related to environmental fears and threats.” (pg. 94). While a valuable introduction to the concept of ocean identity, this early definition focuses primarily on the how aspects of ocean identity, within a specific group, and presents little evidence as to why people come to have the ocean identities that they maintain.
Our work seeks to develop a deeper understanding of not just how individuals express their ocean identities, but what drives their ocean identities and why? Therefore, we assert the value of a broader definition of ocean identity defined as “the connection between an individual’s self-concept and ocean spaces.” Given the growing emphasis on the need to understand the complexities of ocean-human relationships, the construct of ocean identity provides a valuable lens that can be used to unpack the multiple conceptual dimensions that may explain why individuals perceive their connection with the ocean in a particular way. Through this paper, we further explore and conceptualize this emergent construct in order to deepen understanding of human connections with ocean spaces.
The inventory of conceptual attributes developed addresses a number of research gaps1 and signals a diversity of attributes that may be considered in measuring an individual’s ocean identity. This framework goes beyond what has already been explored, as it includes a robust list of aspects of environmental identity and ocean literacy concepts that may explain one’s ocean identity across cognitive, affective, and behavioral contexts. A valid and reliable statistical instrument for measuring ocean identity is currently being tested using the conceptual dimensions presented here. Table 1 shown below identifies the cognitive, affective, and behavioral aspects that were identified through our literature review. It serves as a conceptual framework for our revised definition of ocean identity.
Establishing the need for ocean identity research
Despite its vastness and seeming never-ending capacity to withstand the pressures placed on it by human society, the global ocean is not limitless2. Worldwide, marine and coastal ecosystems are experiencing unprecedented levels of anthropogenic pressure; as efforts to address the challenges facing the global ocean continue, recent years have witnessed a resounding call for greater consideration of the connection between the ocean and society3,4. January 2021 marked the beginning of the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development5 (hereafter the UN Ocean Decade), which sets out an aspiration to transform the “relationship between people and the ocean,” calling for improved interdisciplinarity and integration of social and natural sciences, including diverse knowledge and values, to address ocean challenges. This goal is an indication of shifting values at the global scale toward ocean and coastal, or “blue,” issues6.
There is growing acknowledgment that marine environments provide many discernible and indiscernible resources to humankind, and a need to understand the complexity of the interconnections between society and the sea in order to deliver sustainable management and conservation1,3,4,7. Efforts to improve ocean connections around the world are aligning with this growing interest in blue issues, with ocean literacy positioned as a key mechanism for delivery of the UN Ocean Decade goals. Related to this, while it is well established in the literature that identity or orientations drive human behavior8, the notion of ocean identity, and its role in understanding the complex relationships between people and the ocean, has received limited attention to date.
Bridging the gap between ocean literacy and environmental identity
Recent years have seen resounding calls for the incorporation of the human component into our assessments of socio-ecological condition and relationships9,10—including within ocean literacy, and other parallel concepts and frameworks. Originating in the early 2000s, ocean literacy has historically been defined as having “an understanding of your influence on the ocean and its influence on you”11. Until recently, there has been a persistent lack of attention to the multitude of socio-cultural and humanistic aspects of ocean literacy, with the majority of studies framing the concept around knowledge and awareness obtained through formal school education and assessment12,13,14. Further, these efforts rarely take into account informal and free choice learning educational interventions1,14, or explore how experience and personal connection might influence levels of ocean literacy and related behaviors15. Recently, the landscape around the concept and its application has evolved suggesting that contemporary models of ocean literacy lack a thorough understanding of the social factors which may influence connection to the ocean15,16,17,18.
Despite growing recognition of the importance of social and human dimensions, many existing ocean literacy assessments do not yet account for the complex and dynamic facets included within models of marine citizenship19,20 or environmental citizenship21, for example. Coupled with a need to expand the previously accepted dimensions of ocean literacy—awareness, knowledge, attitudes, communication, behavior and activism (as outlined by ref. 17, there is also a need to better integrate additional influencers, including emotional connection, adaptive capacity, experiences and social values, in expressions of ocean literacy16. However, due to the nascent nature of this interdisciplinary topical area, to date, there has been limited effort to effectively assess the various dimensions of ocean literacy (or other related concepts) across various geographical scales (see, for example, refs. 22,23).
Like ocean literacy, the construct of environmental identity is not novel, and has been studied for decades24,25, with studies showing that interactions with nature and the environment facilitate and stimulate environmental identity development26. The importance of understanding the whole spectrum of human dimensions has received growing emphasis in recent years, including an increased focus on the role of emotions in the context of societal relationships with nature and the environment27. Milton28 frames emotions, for example, as being integral to a person’s ability to relate to, and connect with, an environment and a caring relationship with a nonhuman entity to be created. However, while knowledge, attitudes and other dimensions of societal relationships with the ocean are of growing interest, emotions relating to ocean environments have received relatively limited attention29 Further, while the existing literature on environmental identity provides a useful framework, there has been limited application of it within an ocean context.
Taking ocean identity forward
In order to advance the construct of ocean identity, there is a first a need to consider what attributes comprise it. Drawing from existing scholarship on environmental identity and ocean literacy, this paper presents an early description of the concept of ocean identity and highlights key affective, cognitive, and behavioral attributes that can be expected to contribute to an individual’s sense of ocean identity.
This framework is currently being used in the validation of a statistically valid and reliable instrument for adequately measuring and furthering the conceptualization of ocean identity. The factors included here demonstrate the multiplicity of concepts that, in theory, may affect how one’s ocean identity presents at a given point in time. Future research will uncover a statistically validated model, though researchers should continue to explore the complexity of human connections with ocean spaces, as illustrated in the conceptual ocean identity framework presented. Additionally, as efforts continue to better understand human–ocean relationships in order to deliver the goals of the UN Ocean Decade, the construct of ocean identity has a valuable role to play as a construct in its own right, but also in enhancing societal ocean literacy.
Data availability
This work is based on existing literature and is an alignment of multiple areas of research to present a new conceptual framework derived from these multiple fields of research and existing knowledge.
Code availability
No data coding was conducted in the development of this work.
References
-
Jaksha, A. P. in Exemplary Practices in Marine Science Education (eds Fauville, G. et al.) 93–107 (Springer, 2019).
-
IPCC. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) (IPCC, 2019).
-
McKinley, E., Acott, T. & Yates, K. L. Marine social sciences: looking towards a sustainable future. Environ. Sci. Policy 108, 85–92 (2020).
Google Scholar
-
Bennett, N. J. Marine social science for the peopled seas. Coast. Manag. 47, 244–252 (2019).
Google Scholar
-
Ryabinin, V. et al. The UN decade of ocean science for sustainable development. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 470 (2019).
Google Scholar
-
Lee, K. H., Noh, J. & Khim, J. S. The blue economy and the United Nations’ sustainable development goals: challenges and opportunities. Environ. Int. 137, 105528 (2020).
Google Scholar
-
Claudet, J. The seven domains of action for a sustainable ocean. Cell 184, 1426–1429 (2021).
Google Scholar
-
Crompton, T. & Kasser, T. Human identity: a missing link in environmental campaigning. Environment 52, 23–33 (2010).
-
Berkes, F. Coasts for People: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Coastal and Marine Resource Management (Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2015).
-
IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2014).
-
National Marine Education Association. Ocean literacy: the essential principles and fundamental concepts of ocean sciences for learners of all ages. https://www.marine-ed.org/ocean-literacy/overview (2020).
-
Fauville, G., Payne, D. L., Marrero, M. E., Lantz-Andersson, A. & Crouch, F. Exemplary Practices in Marine Science Education (Springer, 2019).
-
Guest, H., Lotze, H. K. & Wallace, D. Youth and the sea: ocean literacy in Nova Scotia, Canada. Mar. Policy 58, 98–107 (2015).
Google Scholar
-
Steel, B. S., Smith, C., Opsommer, L., Curiel, S. & Warner-Steel, R. Public ocean literacy in the United States. Ocean Coast. Manag. 48, 97–114 (2005).
Google Scholar
-
McKinley, E. & Burdon, D. Understanding ocean literacy and ocean climate-related behaviour change in the UK: an evidence synthesis. Final report produced for the Ocean Conservation Trust and DEFRA (FAO, 2020).
-
McKinley, E., Burdon, D. & Shellock, R. J. The evolution of ocean literacy: a new framework for the United Nations Ocean Decade and beyond. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 186, 114467 (2023).
Google Scholar
-
Brennan, C., Ashley, M. & Molloy, O. A system dynamics approach to increasing ocean literacy. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 360 (2019).
Google Scholar
-
Stoll-Kleemann, S. Feasible options for behavior change toward more effective ocean literacy: a systematic review. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 273 (2019).
Google Scholar
-
Buchan, P. M., Evans, L. S., Pieraccini, M. & Barr, S. Marine citizenship: the right to participate in the transformation of the human-ocean relationship for sustainability. PLoS ONE 18, e0280518 (2023).
Google Scholar
-
McKinley, E. & Fletcher, S. Improving marine environmental health through marine citizenship: a call for debate. Mar. Policy 36, 839–843 (2012).
Google Scholar
-
Hawthorne, M. & Alabaster, T. Citizen 2000: development of a model of environmental citizenship. Glob. Environ. Chang. 9, 25–43 (1999).
Google Scholar
-
Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). Ocean Literacy Headline Report England. https://oceanconservationtrust.org/ocean-literacy-survey-results-2022/ (2022).
-
Glithero, L. Understanding ocean literacy in Canada. National Report. https://colcoalition.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atlantic-Regional-Report_Final.pdf (2020).
-
Clayton, S. & Opotow, S. Identity and the Natural Environment (The MIT Press, 2003).
-
Clayton, S. & Opotow, S. in Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature (eds Clayton, S. & Opotow, S.) 1–24 (MIT Press, 2003).
-
Stapleton, S. R. Environmental identity development through social interactions, action, and recognition. J. Environ. Educ. 46, 94–113 (2015).
Google Scholar
-
Hinds, J. & Sparks, P. Investigating environmental identity, well-being, and meaning. Ecopsychology 1, 181–186 (2009).
Google Scholar
-
Milton, K. Loving Nature: Towards an Ecology of Emotion (Routledge, 2002).
-
Kearns, R. & Collins, D. Feeling for the coast: the place of emotion in resistance to residential development. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 13, 937–955 (2012).
Google Scholar
Acknowledgements
Funding for this work was provided by Connecticut Sea Grant, University of Connecticut through Award No. NA22OAR4170093, Project Number R/ED-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.M.R.K. led this work, while E.M., J.M.P.V., J.H.M., and J.-M.K. provided significant support in content development. C.M. supported the editing and final preparation of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and Permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelly, M.R., Kasinak, JM., McKinley, E. et al. Conceptualizing the construct of ocean identity.
npj Ocean Sustain 2, 17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-023-00025-7
-
Received: 16 February 2023
-
Accepted: 04 October 2023
-
Published: 30 October 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-023-00025-7