1. Shi, R., Waterhouse, G. I. & Zhang, T. Recent progress in photocatalytic CO₂ reduction over perovskite oxides. Solar RRL 1, 1700126 (2017).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

2. Sumaria, V., Nguyen, L., Tao, F. F. & Sautet, P. Atomic-scale mechanism of platinum catalyst restructuring under a pressure of reactant gas. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 392–401 (2023).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

3. Fabbri, E. et al. Dynamic surface self-reconstruction is the key of highly active perovskite nano-electrocatalysts for water splitting. Nat. Mater. 16, 925–931 (2017).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

4. Zhang, Z., Wei, Z., Sautet, P. & Alexandrova, A. N. Hydrogen-induced restructuring of a Cu(100) electrode in electroreduction conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 19284–19293 (2022).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

5. Sha, Z., Shen, Z., Cali, E., Kilner, J. A. & Skinner, S. J. Understanding surface chemical processes in perovskite oxide electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. 11, 5645–5659 (2023).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

6. Jung, S.-K. et al. Understanding the degradation mechanisms of LiNi_0.5Co_0.2Mn_0.3O₂ cathode material in lithium ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1300787 (2014).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

7. Han, B. et al. From coating to dopant: how the transition metal composition affects alumina coatings on Ni-rich cathodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 41291–41302 (2017).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

8. Xu, C. et al. Bulk fatigue induced by surface reconstruction in layered Ni-rich cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Nat. Mater. 20, 84–92 (2021).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

9. Hirata, A., Saiki, K., Koma, A. & Ando, A. Electronic structure of a SrO-terminated SrTiO₃(100) surface. Surf. Sci. 319, 267–271 (1994).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

10. Castell, M. R. Scanning tunneling microscopy of reconstructions on the SrTiO₃(001) surface. Surf. Sci. 505, 1–13 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

11. Erdman, N. et al. The structure and chemistry of the TiO₂-rich surface of SrTiO₃(001). Nature 419, 55–58 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

12. Heifets, E., Piskunov, S., Kotomin, E. A., Zhukovskii, Y. F. & Ellis, D. E. Electronic structure and thermodynamic stability of double-layered SrTiO₃(001) surfaces: ab initio simulations. Phys. Rev. B 75, 115417 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

13. Li, H., Jiao, Y., Davey, K. & Qiao, S.-Z. Data-driven machine learning for understanding surface structures of heterogeneous catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 135, e202216383 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

14. Merte, L. R. et al. Structure of an ultrathin oxide on Pt₃Sn(111) solved by machine learning enhanced global optimization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202204244 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

15. Foiles, S. M., Baskes, M. I. & Daw, M. S. Embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983–7991 (1986).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

16. Nord, J., Albe, K., Erhart, P. & Nordlund, K. Modelling of compound semiconductors: analytical bond-order potential for gallium, nitrogen and gallium nitride. J. Phys. Condensed Matter 15, 5649 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

17. Kolpak, A. M., Li, D., Shao, R., Rappe, A. M. & Bonnell, D. A. Evolution of the structure and thermodynamic stability of the BaTiO₃(001) surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 036102 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

18. Wexler, R. B., Qiu, T. & Rappe, A. M. Automatic prediction of surface phase diagrams using ab initio grand canonical Monte Carlo. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 2321–2328 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

19. Zhou, X.-F., Oganov, A. R., Shao, X., Zhu, Q. & Wang, H.-T. Unexpected reconstruction of the α-boron (111) surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 176101 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

20. Timmermann, J. et al. IrO₂ surface complexions identified through machine learning and surface investigations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 206101 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

21. Wales, D. J. & Doye, J. P. K. Global optimization by basin-hopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard–Jones clusters containing up to 110 atoms. J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 5111–5116 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

22. Panosetti, C., Krautgasser, K., Palagin, D., Reuter, K. & Maurer, R. J. Global materials structure search with chemically motivated coordinates. Nano Lett. 15, 8044–8048 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

23. Obersteiner, V., Scherbela, M., Hörmann, L., Wegner, D. & Hofmann, O. T. Structure prediction for surface-induced phases of organic monolayers: overcoming the combinatorial bottleneck. Nano Lett. 17, 4453–4460 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

24. Egger, A. T. et al. Charge transfer into organic thin films: a deeper insight through machine-learning-assisted structure search. Adv. Sci. 7, 2000992 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

25. Bauer, M. N., Probert, M. I. J. & Panosetti, C. Systematic comparison of genetic algorithm and basin hopping approaches to the global optimization of Si(111) surface reconstructions. J. Phys. Chem. A 126, 3043–3056 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

26. Wang, Q., Oganov, A. R., Zhu, Q. & Zhou, X.-F. New reconstructions of the (110) surface of rutile TiO₂ predicted by an evolutionary method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 266101 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

27. Schusteritsch, G. & Pickard, C. J. Predicting interface structures: from SrTiO₃ to graphene. Phys. Rev. B 90, 035424 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

28. Meldgaard, S. A., Mortensen, H. L., Jørgensen, M. S. & Hammer, B. Structure prediction of surface reconstructions by deep reinforcement learning. J. Phys. Condensed Matter 32, 404005 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

29. Hess, F. & Yildiz, B. Polar or not polar? The interplay between reconstruction, Sr enrichment, and reduction at the La_0.75Sr_0.25MnO₃(001) surface. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 015801 (2020).

30. Unke, O. T. et al. Machine learning force fields. Chem. Rev. 121, 10142–10186 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

31. Axelrod, S. et al. Learning matter: materials design with machine learning and atomistic simulations. Acc. Mater. Res. 3, 343–357 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

32. Bisbo, M. K. & Hammer, B. Efficient global structure optimization with a machine-learned surrogate model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086102 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

33. Bisbo, M. K. & Hammer, B. Global optimization of atomic structure enhanced by machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 105, 245404 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

34. Timmermann, J. et al. Data-efficient iterative training of Gaussian approximation potentials: application to surface structure determination of rutile IrO₂ and RuO₂. J. Chem. Phys. 155, 244107 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

35. Rønne, N. et al. Atomistic structure search using local surrogate model. J. Chem. Phys. 157, 174115 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

36. Han, Y. et al. Prediction of surface reconstructions using MAGUS. J. Chem. Phys. 158, 174109 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

37. Xu, J., Xie, W., Han, Y. & Hu, P. Atomistic insights into the oxidation of flat and stepped platinum surfaces using large-scale machine learning potential-based grand-canonical Monte Carlo. ACS Catal. 12, 14812–14824 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

38. Bernardin, F. E. & Rutledge, G. C. Semi-grand canonical Monte Carlo (SGMC) simulations to interpret experimental data on processed polymer melts and glasses. Macromolecules 40, 4691–4702 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

39. Damewood, J., Schwalbe-Koda, D. & Gómez-Bombarelli, R. Sampling lattices in semi-grand canonical ensemble with autoregressive machine learning. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 61 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

40. Carrete, J., Montes-Campos, H., Wanzenböck, R., Heid, E. & Madsen, G. K. H. Deep ensembles vs committees for uncertainty estimation in neural-network force fields: comparison and application to active learning. J. Chem. Phys. 158, 204801 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

41. Tan, A. R., Urata, S., Goldman, S., Dietschreit, J. C. B. & Gómez-Bombarelli, R. Single-model uncertainty quantification in neural network potentials does not consistently outperform model ensembles. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01754 (2023).

42. Schwalbe-Koda, D., Tan, A. R. & Gómez-Bombarelli, R. Differentiable sampling of molecular geometries with uncertainty-based adversarial attacks. Nat. Commun. 12, 5104 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

43. Fu, X. et al. Forces are not enough: benchmark and critical evaluation for machine learning force fields with molecular simulations. Transactions on Machine Learning Research https://openreview.net/forum?id=A8pqQipwkt (2023).

44. Damewood, J. et al. Representations of materials for machine learning. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 53, 399–426 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

45. Stephenson, P. C. L., Radny, M. W. & Smith, P. V. A modified Stillinger–Weber potential for modelling silicon surfaces. Surf. Sci. 366, 177–184 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

46. Northrup, J. E., Neugebauer, J., Feenstra, R. M. & Smith, A. R. Structure of GaN(0001): the laterally contracted Ga bilayer model. Phys. Rev. B 61, 9932–9935 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

47. Štich, I., Payne, M. C., King-Smith, R. D., Lin, J.-S. & Clarke, L. J. Ab initio total-energy calculations for extremely large systems: application to the Takayanagi reconstruction of Si(111). Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1351–1354 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

48. Smeu, M., Guo, H., Ji, W. & Wolkow, R. A. Electronic properties of Si(111)-7×7 and related reconstructions: density functional theory calculations. Phys. Rev. B 85, 195315 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

49. Herger, R. et al. Surface of strontium titanate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 076102 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

50. Hong, C. et al. Anomalous intense coherent secondary photoemission from a perovskite oxide. Nature 617, 493–498 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

51. Szot, K. & Speier, W. Surfaces of reduced and oxidized SrTiO₃ from atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 60, 5909–5926 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

52. Kubo, T. & Nozoye, H. Surface structure of SrTiO₃(100). Surf. Sci. 542, 177–191 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

53. Winter, G. & Gómez-Bombarelli, R. Simulations with machine learning potentials identify the ion conduction mechanism mediating non-Arrhenius behavior in LGPS. J. Phys. Energy 5, 024004 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

54. Millan, R., Bello-Jurado, E., Moliner, M., Boronat, M. & Gomez-Bombarelli, R. Effect of framework composition and NH₃ on the diffusion of Cu⁺ in Cu-CHA catalysts predicted by machine-learning accelerated molecular dynamics. ACS Cent. Sci. 9, 2044–2056 (2023).

55. Thompson, A. P. et al. LAMMPS—a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

56. Larsen, A. H. et al. The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condensed Matter 29, 273002 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

57. Boes, J. R., Mamun, O., Winther, K. & Bligaard, T. Graph theory approach to high-throughput surface adsorption structure generation. J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 2281–2285 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

58. Ong, S. P. et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

59. Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

60. Jain, A. et al. The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

61. Schütt, K., Unke, O. & Gastegger, M. Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectra. In Proc. 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, Proc. Machine Learning Research Vol. 139 (eds Meila, M. & Zhang, T.) 9377–9388 (PMLR, 2021).

62. Martinez-Cantin, R., Tee, K. & McCourt, M. Practical Bayesian optimization in the presence of outliers. In Proc. Twenty-First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Proc. Machine Learning Research Vol. 84 (eds Storkey, A. & Perez-Cruz, F.) 1722–1731 (PMLR, 2018).

63. Ramachandran, P., Zoph, B. & Le, Q. V. Searching for activation functions. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05941 (2017).

64. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015 (eds Bengio, Y. & LeCun, Y.) (2015).

65. Gasteiger, J., Giri, S., Margraf, J. T. & Günnemann, S. Fast and uncertainty-aware directional message passing for non-equilibrium molecules. Machine Learning for Molecules Workshop, NeurIPS 2020 https://ml4molecules.github.io/papers2020/ML4Molecules_2020_paper_35.pdf (2020).

66. Reuter, K. & Scheffler, M. Composition, structure, and stability of RuO₂(110) as a function of oxygen pressure. Phys. Rev, B 65, 035406 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

67. Heifets, E., Ho, J. & Merinov, B. Density functional simulation of the BaZrO₃(011) surface structure. Phys. Rev. B 75, 155431 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

68. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

69. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

70. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

71. Tadmor, E. B., Elliott, R. S., Sethna, J. P., Miller, R. E. & Becker, C. A. The potential of atomistic simulations and the knowledgebase of interatomic models. JOM 63, 17 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

72. Du, X. Data for: Machine-learning-accelerated simulations to enable automatic surface reconstruction. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7758174 (2023).

73. Du, X. learningmatter-mit/surface-sampling. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10086398 (2023).

Download references