1. Leslie, H. M. & McLeod, K. L. Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem‐based management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 540–548 (2007).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

2. Hilty, J. et al. Guidelines for Conserving Connectivity Through Ecological Networks and Corridors (IUCN, 2020).

3. Fontoura, L. et al. Protecting connectivity promotes successful biodiversity and fisheries conservation. Science 375, 336–340 (2022).

   Article 
   CAS 

   Google Scholar 

4. Riordan‐Short, E., Pither, R. & Pither, J. Four steps to strengthen connectivity modeling. Ecography 2023, e06766 (2023).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

5. Beger, M. et al. Demystifying ecological connectivity for actionable spatial conservation planning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 1079–1091 (2022).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

6. Knight, A. T. et al. Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research–implementation gap. Conserv. Biol. 22, 610–617 (2008).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

7. Oppler, G., Hilty, J. A., Laur, A. T. & Tabor, G. Connectivity conservation: the time is now. Parks Steward. Forum 37, 3 (2021).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

8. Balbar, A. C. & Metaxas, A. The current application of ecological connectivity in the design of marine protected areas. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 17, e00569 (2019).

   Google Scholar 

9. Harrison, H. B., Bode, M., Williamson, D. H., Berumen, M. L. & Jones, G. P. A connectivity portfolio effect stabilizes marine reserve performance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 25595–25600 (2020).

   Article 
   CAS 

   Google Scholar 

10. Caselle, J., Carr, M. & White, W. Northern Channel Islands: Connectivity Across a Network of Marine Protected Areas Contributes to Positive Population and Ecosystem Consequences (IUCN Guidelines, 2020).

11. Hamilton, R. J. et al. Larval dispersal and fishing pressure influence recruitment in a coral reef fishery. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 2924–2935 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

12. Almany, G. R. et al. Dispersal of grouper larvae drives local resource sharing in a coral reef fishery. Curr. Biol. 23, 626–630 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

13. Goetze, J. S. et al. Increased connectivity and depth improve the effectiveness of marine reserves. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 3432–3447 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

14. Muallil, R. N. et al. Effectiveness of small locally-managed marine protected areas for coral reef fisheries management in the Philippines. Ocean Coast. Manage. 179, 104831 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

15. Smallhorn-West, P. et al. The Fisheries Co-Management Guidebook: Emerging Research for the Effective Management of Small-Scale Fisheries (WorldFish, 2023).

16. Jupiter, S., Cohen, P., Weeks, R., Tawake, A. & Govan, H. Locally-managed marine areas: multiple objectives and diverse strategies. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 20, 165–179 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

17. Jupiter, S. D., Weeks, R., Jenkins, A. P., Egli, D. P. & Cakacaka, A. Effects of a single intensive harvest event on fish populations inside a customary marine closure. Coral Reefs 31, 321–334 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

18. Jupiter, S. D. & Egli, D. P. Ecosystem‐based management in Fiji: successes and challenges after five years of implementation. J. Mar. Sci. 2011, 940765 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

19. Buston, P. M. & D’Aloia, C. C. Marine ecology: reaping the benefits of local dispersal. Curr. Biol. 23, R351–R353 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

20. Welden, E. A., Chausson, A. & Melanidis, M. S. Leveraging nature‐based solutions for transformation: reconnecting people and nature. People Nat. 3, 966–977 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

21. Green, A. L. et al. Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design. Biol. Rev. 90, 1215–1247 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

22. Bode, M. et al. Successful validation of a larval dispersal model using genetic parentage data. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000380 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

23. Teh, L. S. L., Teh, L. C. L. & Sumaila, U. R. A global estimate of the number of coral reef fishers. PLoS ONE 8, e65397 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

24. Abesamis, R. A. et al. Reef-fish larval dispersal patterns validate no-take marine reserve network connectivity that links human communities. Coral Reefs 36, 791–801 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

25. Treml, E. A., Fidelman, P. I. J., Kininmonth, S., Ekstrom, J. A. & Bodin, Ö. Analyzing the (mis)fit between the institutional and ecological networks of the Indo-West Pacific. Glob. Environ. Change 31, 263–271 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

26. Abesamis, R. A. & Russ, G. R. Density‐dependent spillover from a marine reserve: long‐term evidence. Ecol. Appl. 15, 1798–1812 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

27. Bernatchez, L., Ferchaud, A.-L., Berger, C. S., Venney, C. J. & Xuereb, A. Genomics for monitoring and understanding species responses to global climate change. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 165–183 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

28. Bodin, Ö. Collaborative environmental governance: achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science 357, eaan1114 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

29. Barnes, M. L. et al. Social–ecological alignment and ecological conditions in coral reefs. Nat. Commun. 10, 2039 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

30. Cinner, J. E. & McClanahan, T. R. A sea change on the African coast? Preliminary social and ecological outcomes of a governance transformation in Kenyan fisheries. Glob. Environ. Change 30, 133–139 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

31. Hamilton, R. J., Potuku, T. & Montambault, J. R. Community-based conservation results in the recovery of reef fish spawning aggregations in the Coral Triangle. Biol. Conserv. 144, 1850–1858 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

32. Foale, S. & Manele, B. Social and political barriers to the use of marine protected areas for conservation and fishery management in Melanesia. Asia Pac. Viewp. 45, 373–386 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

33. Bitoun, R. E. et al. A methodological framework for capturing marine small-scale fisheries’ contributions to the sustainable development goals. Sustain. Sci. 19, 1119–1137 (2024).

34. Esmail, N. et al. What’s on the horizon for community-based conservation? Emerging threats and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 38, 666–680 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

35. Kawaka, J. A. et al. Developing locally managed marine areas: lessons learnt from Kenya. Ocean Coast. Manage. 135, 1–10 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

36. Mayol, T. L. Madagascar’s nascent locally managed marine area network. Madag. Conserv. Dev. 8, 91–95 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

37. Pomeroy, R. S. et al. Guidebook for Evaluating Fisheries Co-management Effectiveness (FAO, 2022).

38. Brown, K. T., Southgate, P. C., Hewavitharane, C. A. & Lal, M. M. Saving the sea cucumbers: using population genomic tools to inform fishery and conservation management of the Fijian sandfish Holothuria (Metriatyla) scabra. PLoS ONE 17, e0274245 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

39. Leis, J. M. Ontogeny of behaviour in larvae of marine demersal fishes. Ichthyol. Res. 57, 325–342 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

40. de Mitcheson, Y. S. & Colin, P. L. Reef Fish Spawning Aggregations: Biology, Research and Management Vol. 35 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011).

41. Waldie, P. A. et al. Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 150694 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

42. Davies, H. N. et al. Mapping the marine environment through a cross-cultural collaboration. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 716 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

43. Hamilton, R., de Mitcheson, Y. S. & Aguilar-Perera, A. in Reef Fish Spawning Aggregations: Biology, Research and Management. (eds de Mitcheson, Y. S. & Colin, P. L.) 331–369 (Springer, 2011).

44. Prince, J. et al. Spawning potential surveys in Fiji: a new song of change for small‐scale fisheries in the Pacific. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e273 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

45. McClanahan, T. R., Marnane, M. J., Cinner, J. E. & Kiene, W. E. A comparison of marine protected areas and alternative approaches to coral-reef management. Curr. Biol. 16, 1408–1413 (2006).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

46. Bladon, A. J., Mohammed, E. Y., Ali, L. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Developing a frame of reference for fisheries management and conservation interventions. Fish. Res. 208, 296–308 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

47. Medoff, S., Lynham, J. & Raynor, J. Spillover benefits from the world’s largest fully protected MPA. Science 378, 313–316 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

48. Cheung, W. W. L. et al. Rebuilding fish biomass for the world’s marine ecoregions under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 6254–6267 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

49. Barceló, C., White, J. W., Botsford, L. W. & Hastings, A. Projecting the timescale of initial increase in fishery yield after implementation of marine protected areas. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 78, 1860–1871 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

50. Coleman, M. A. et al. Anticipating changes to future connectivity within a network of marine protected areas. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3533–3542 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

51. Davis, R. A. & Hanich, Q. Transparency in fisheries conservation and management measures. Mar. Policy 136, 104088 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

52. Carruthers, T. R. et al. Method evaluation and risk assessment: a framework for evaluating management strategies for data‐limited fisheries. Fish Fish. 24, 279–296 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

53. Recognising and Reporting Other Effective Area‐Based Conservation Measures (WCPA, 2019).

54. Voss, R. et al. Quantifying the benefits of spatial fisheries management—an ecological–economic optimization approach. Ecol. Modell. 385, 165–172 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

55. Harding, S., Marama, K., Breckwoldt, A., Matairakula, U. & Fache, E. Marine resources and their value in Kadavu, Fiji. Ambio 51, 2414–2430 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

56. Robertson, T. et al. Locally managed marine areas: implications for socio-economic impacts in Kadavu, Fiji. Mar. Policy 117, 103950 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

57. O’Garra, T. et al. National-level evaluation of a community-based marine management initiative. Nat. Sustain. 6, 908–918 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

58. Garcia, S. M. et al. OECMs in marine capture fisheries: key implementation issues of governance, management, and biodiversity. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 920051 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

59. Jagadish, A. et al. Scaling Indigenous-led natural resource management. Glob. Environ. Change 84, 102799 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

60. Gurney, G. G. et al. Biodiversity needs every tool in the box: use OECMs. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02041-4 (2021).

61. Bremer, L. L. et al. Embedding local values in payments for ecosystem services for transformative change. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 64, 101354 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

62. Booth, H. et al. Designing locally-appropriate conservation incentives for small-scale fishers. Biol. Conserv. 277, 109821 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

63. Bell, J. D. et al. Adaptations to maintain the contributions of small-scale fisheries to food security in the Pacific Islands. Mar. Policy 88, 303–314 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

64. Saint-Amand, A., Lambrechts, J. & Hanert, E. Biophysical models resolution affects coral connectivity estimates. Sci. Rep. 13, 9414 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

65. Reed, J. et al. The extent and distribution of joint conservation–development funding in the tropics. One Earth 3, 753–762 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

66. Fariss, B. et al. Catalyzing success in community‐based conservation. Conserv. Biol. 37, e13973 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

67. Ripple, K. J. et al. Enabling usable science takes a community: using our roles as funders to catalyze change. PLoS Biol. 22, e3002675 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

68. McClanahan, T., Muthiga, N. A. & Abunge, C. A. Establishment of community managed fisheries’ closures in Kenya: early evolution of the tengefu movement. Coast. Manage. 44, 1–20 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

69. Cinner, J. E. et al. Vulnerability of coastal communities to key impacts of climate change on coral reef fisheries. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 12–20 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

70. Barr, R., Bruner, A. & Edwards, S. Fisheries improvement projects and small-scale fisheries: the need for a modified approach. Mar. Policy 105, 109–115 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

Download references