Meet the unsung scientists behind the Nobel for quantum dots


Nobel prizewinners almost never work in isolation. They might be the driving force behind their award-winning discoveries, but a whole host of collaborators, postdoctoral fellows and graduate students helped to realize their vision in the laboratory.

Where do those scientists end up? What is it like for them to be part of a celebrated piece of scientific history? Nature caught up with some of the researchers who contributed to the work recognized by this year’s Nobel Prize in Chemistry, given to quantum-dot pioneers Moungi Bawendi at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, Louis Brus at Columbia University in New York City, and Alexei Ekimov, previously at New York-based company Nanocrystals Technology.

Building a lab from scratch

Christopher Murray was among the first batch of graduate students that Bawendi hired for his lab at MIT in 1990. “We began our lives together in our graduate studies at the time that [Moungi] began his life as a professor,” Murray says. Bawendi had himself just finished a stint as a postdoc, working with Brus at the innovative Bell Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey.

Christopher B. Murray

Christopher Murray.Credit: Cherie R. Kagan

Murray loved the process of building a research lab from scratch. He and another grad student, David Norris, who is now a materials engineer at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, helped Bawendi to work out the process of synthesizing quantum dots. Before this, researchers, including Ekimov and Brus, had observed the dots — tiny semiconductor crystals — emitting various wavelengths of light, and worked out that the wavelengths depended on the dots’ size. But they hadn’t yet developed the chemistry to produce them in a controlled way.

Bawendi’s group developed a strategy that encouraged semiconductor nanoparticles to assemble themselves into consistent, complex structures. The work would eventually be published in a seminal 1993 paper1, and would also form chapters in Murray’s PhD thesis. ”You can think about them as Lego blocks,” Murray says of the nanocrystals. “In the state of their isolated existence, they have lots of interesting properties, but Lego blocks are most interesting when you start putting them together in creative ways.”

Manoj Nirmal was another of Bawendi’s original graduate students. He remembers Bawendi giving a talk at MIT, trying to recruit people for his lab. “What I was really intrigued and fascinated by was, it was very different than anything else that was happening in the [chemistry] department,” Nirmal says. Most chemists at the time were not melding their work with ideas from solid-state physics, as Bawendi intended to do.

Manoj Nirmal

Manoj Nirmal.Credit: Manoj Nirmal

Once the team was able to controllably synthesize quantum dots of different materials and predictable sizes, they were able to start scrutinizing the dots’ behaviour. “I remember these remarkably subtle features,” Nirmal says. For instance, he used magnetic fields to measure the quantum ‘spin’ of the excitons — pairs of electrons and holes — in the crystals to see how that affected the colour of the emitted light2.

In his final year of graduate school, Nirmal won a fellowship to study under Brus at Bell Labs for the summer. But he ended up staying longer — the entire year — as Brus’s and Bawendi’s teams continued to explore the properties of quantum dots. He remembers the work fondly. “My colleagues were just absolutely incredible, so that was the real pleasure,” he says.

The chemistry Nobel is the icing on the cake, say Murray and Nirmal. “It’s extremely exciting to see that what [Moungi] built is recognized as part of the Nobel prize,” Murray says.

Behind the Iron Curtain

But these two teams were not the only ones to study quantum dots in those heady days of discovery. In the early 1980s, Ekimov had observed size-dependent light emission effects in glass doped with quantum dots made of copper chloride. During that time, he worked at the S.I. Vavilov State Optical Institute in what was then Leningrad in the Soviet Union (now St Petersburg in Russia). Alexander Efros, a theoretician at the A.F. Ioffe Institute, also in Leningrad, was collaborating with Ekimov to study how the size of the crystals affected the way in which electrons were confined within the crystals and, thus, which wavelengths of light they absorbed and emitted. “It was a major breakthrough — the first visual observation of the quantum confinement effect,” Efros says.

Dr. Alexander “Sasha” Efros

Alexander Efros.Credit: Jamie J. Hartman/U.S. Naval Research Laboratory

It wasn’t until 1984 that Brus learned about the work by reading a translation of Ekimov’s papers, which were in Russian. According to a history of the field, penned by Brus and Efros3, now a researcher in the materials science and technology division of the US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington DC, Brus wrote to Ekimov and Efros, but the two groups could not exchange much information until the Iron Curtain fell in 1989.

Efros recalls first hearing of Brus’s work when his department head called him at home and told him that the institute’s KGB officer wanted to see him urgently. Every university in those days had a representative of the Soviet spy agency assigned to control the activity of scientists, Efros explains, so the call had him worried. “I said, ‘My goodness, what did I do wrong?’”

He went to see the KGB officer, who asked him, “Do you know who is Brus?” Efros said, “Who is Brus? I don’t know him.” The agent handed him a letter and a package of preprints from a journal the scientists didn’t have access to.

As soon as he read the papers, Efros excitedly called Ekimov. “We meet and start to celebrate because we learnt that somebody else in the world is working on nanocrystals,” Efros says. And it was not just anyone, Efros adds; it was a “person from Bell Labs”. That suggested to the researchers that they were on to something.

Efros, Ekimov & Rashba at Sevan Summer School, Erevan, Armenia (former USSR) in May 1984.

In 1984, Efros (right) attended a meeting in what is now Armenia where he gave his first invited talk on quantum dots. There, he and Ekimov (centre) talked to Emmanuel Rashba, a researcher known for his contributions to spin physics (left).Credit: Courtesy of Dr. Alexander Efros

An appreciation for applied science

Decades later, quantum dots have found commercial applications, including in television displays and lighting, improving the brightness and colour of light-emitting diodes (LEDs). They are also being used for medical diagnostics as fluorescent markers that can bind to cancer cells, for instance. Because of these applications, many of the researchers who were involved in the early days of quantum dots used their expertise to connect with industry.

For example, Bawendi founded Lumicell, a company based in Newton, Massachusetts, that makes quantum dots for tagging and lighting up cancer cells during surgery. After leaving MIT, Murray went to the IBM T.J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, New York, to create not only quantum dots for displays, but also a wider range of nanomaterials, including magnetic particles used in recording devices.

Nirmal left academia to work for the company 3M, which makes a wide range of consumer and business products. “Both Moungi and Louis had this appreciation for the application of science, so that drew me to an industrial-research and product-development career,” Nirmal says. Although his early work at 3M drew on his quantum-dot research, these days Nirmal works on some of the firm’s most familiar products, including Scotch tape and Post-it Notes, as a lead product development specialist at the company’s labs in Maplewood, Minnesota.

Murray eventually returned to academia and is now at the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia, where he tries to impart that same appreciation for doing applied science to his students. “Being now in an environment where I get to work with students and contribute across the whole vertical integration spectrum, that’s really exciting,” he says.

His lab is one of several delving into the next phase of this work. “There is a whole other dimension of quantum-dot research that looks at the intrinsic quantum nature of the optical excitations in the quantum dots to make components that are potentially interesting for quantum computing, quantum sensing and quantum communication,” he says. “But that’s another 20 years down the road.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *