1. 2023 on track to be the hottest year ever. What’s next? Copernicus https://climate.copernicus.eu/2023-track-be-hottest-year-ever-whats-next (24 October 2023).

2. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2023. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 5301–5369 (2023).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

3. Stoddard, I. et al. Three decades of climate mitigation: why haven’t we bent the global emissions curve? Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 653–689 (2021).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

4. Minière, A., von Schuckmann, K., Sallée, J.-B. & Vogt, L. Robust acceleration of Earth system heating observed over the past six decades. Sci. Rep. 13, 22975 (2023).

   Article 
   PubMed 
   PubMed Central 

   Google Scholar 

5. Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment (National Academies Press, 1979).

6. Rich, N. Losing Earth: the decade we almost stopped climate change. The New York Times (1 August 2018).

7. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019).

8. Richardson, K. et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh2458 (2023).

   Article 
   PubMed 
   PubMed Central 

   Google Scholar 

9. Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).

   Article 
   PubMed 

   Google Scholar 

10. Armstrong McKay, D. I. et al. Exceeding 1.5 °C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377, eabn7950 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

11. Lamboll, R. D. et al. Assessing the size and uncertainty of remaining carbon budgets. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 1360–1367 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

12. Jones, N. When will global warming actually hit the landmark 1.5 °C limit?. Nature 618, 20 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

13. Finn, C., Grattarola, F. & Pincheira-Donoso, D. More losers than winners: investigating Anthropocene defaunation through the diversity of population trends. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 98, 1732–1748 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

14. Cowie, R. H., Bouchet, P. & Fontaine, B. The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation? Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 97, 640–663 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

15. Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

16. Jaureguiberry, P. et al. The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm9982 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

17. Carson, R. Silent Spring (Houghton Mifflin, 1962).

18. Wagner, D. L., Grames, E. M., Forister, M. L., Berenbaum, M. R. & Stopak, D. Insect decline in the Anthropocene: death by a thousand cuts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023989118 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

19. Hallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12, e0185809 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

20. Rigal, S. et al. Farmland practices are driving bird population decline across Europe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2216573120 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

21. Rosenberg, K. V. et al. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science 366, 120–124 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

22. Lynas, M., Houlton, B. Z. & Perry, S. Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 114005 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

23. Knutti, R. Closing the knowledge-action gap in climate change. One Earth 1, 21–23 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

24. Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L. & Marx, W. Climate change research in view of bibliometrics. PLoS ONE 11, e0160393 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

25. Grieneisen, M. L. & Zhang, M. The current status of climate change research. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 72–73 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

26. Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R. & Mutz, R. Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases. Humanit Soc. Sci. Commun. 8, 224 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

27. International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development 2022 (International Science Council, 2022)

28. Nature protection: Better methods and knowledge to improve the conservation status of EU-protected species and habitats. Horizon-europe.gouv.fr https://www.horizon-europe.gouv.fr/nature-protection-better-methods-and-knowledge-improve-conservation-status-eu-protected-species-and (accessed 17 January 2024).

29. Comprendre les pôles et les glaciers pour mieux les protéger CNRS https://www.cnrs.fr/fr/cnrsinfo/comprendre-les-poles-et-les-glaciers-pour-mieux-les-proteger (24 November 2023).

30. Theissinger, K. et al. How genomics can help biodiversity conservation. Trends Genet. 39, 545–559 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

31. Miller, J. D. Scientific literacy: a conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus 112, 29–48 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

32. Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y. & Leiserowitz, A. A. Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 1014–1020 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

33. Douenne, T. & Fabre, A. French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies. Ecol. Econ. 169, 106496 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

34. Sarewitz, D. Does climate change knowledge really matter? WIREs Clim. Change 2, 475–481 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

35. Descola, P. Beyond nature and culture. Proc. Br. Acad. 139, 137–155 (2006).

36. Reiners, W. A., Reiners, D. S. & Lockwood, J. A. Traits of a good ecologist: what do ecologists think? Ecosphere 4, art86 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

37. Racimo, F. et al. The biospheric emergency calls for scientists to change tactics. eLife 11, e83292 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

38. Urai, A. E. & Kelly, C. Rethinking academia in a time of climate crisis. eLife 12, e84991 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

39. Dablander, F. et al. Climate change engagement of scientists. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02091-2 (2024).

40. Tollefson, J. Top climate scientists are sceptical that nations will rein in global warming. Nature 599, 22–24 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

41. Becker, H. S. Notes on the concept of commitment. Am. J. Sociol. 66, 32–40 (1960).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

42. Morrison, T. H. et al. Radical interventions for climate-impacted systems. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 1100–1106 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

43. Lamb, W. F. et al. Discourses of climate delay. Glob. Sustain. 3, e17 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

44. Gifford, R. The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am. Psychol. 66, 290–302 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

45. Poliakoff, E. & Webb, T. L. What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Sci. Commun. 29, 242–263 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

46. Philippe, H. Less is more: decreasing the number of scientific conferences to promote economic degrowth. Trends Genet. 24, 265–267 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

47. Rappaport, A. & Creighton, S. Degrees That Matter: Climate Change and the University (The MIT Press, 2007).

48. Artico, D. et al. “Beyond being analysts of doom”: scientists on the frontlines of climate action. Front. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1155897 (2023).

49. Isopp, B. Scientists who become activists: are they crossing a line? J. Sci. Commun. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.14020303 (2015).

50. Boykoff, M. & Oonk, D. Evaluating the perils and promises of academic climate advocacy. Clim. Change 163, 27–41 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

51. Entradas, M., Marcelino, J., Bauer, M. W. & Lewenstein, B. Public communication by climate scientists: what, with whom and why? Clim. Change 154, 69–85 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

52. Gardner, C. J., Thierry, A., Rowlandson, W. & Steinberger, J. K. From publications to public actions: the role of universities in facilitating academic advocacy and activism in the climate and ecological emergency. Front. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.679019 (2021).

53. Borgermann, N., Schmidt, A. & Dobbelaere, J. Preaching water while drinking wine: why universities must boost climate action now. One Earth 5, 18–21 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

54. Gardner, C. J. & Wordley, C. F. R. Scientists must act on our own warnings to humanity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1271–1272 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

55. Green, J. F. Less talk, more walk: why climate change demands activism in the academy. Daedalus 149, 151–162 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

56. Oreskes, N. What is the social responsibility of climate scientists? Daedalus 149, 33–45 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

57. Dablander, F., Sachisthal, M. S. M. & Haslbeck, J. Going beyond research: climate actions by climate and non-climate researchers. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5fqtr (2024).

58. Singh, G. G. et al. A more social science: barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 161–166 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

59. Carbou, G. & Sébastien, L. Les discours d’inaction climatique dans la communauté scientifique. Écologie Politique 67, 71–91 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

60. Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., Yuan, S. & Lawrence, F. Understanding scientists’ willingness to engage. Sci. Commun. 40, 559–590 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

61. Pidgeon, N. & Fischhoff, B. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 35–41 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

62. Stamenkovic, P. Facts and objectivity in science. Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 48, 277–298 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

63. Whitney, K. Tangled up in knots: an emotional ecology of field science. Emot., Space Soc. 6, 100–107 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

64. Weber, M. Politics as a Vocation (Oxford Univ. Press, 1946).

65. Stengers, I. Another look: relearning to laugh. Hypatia 15, 41–54 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

66. Reiss, J. & Sprenger, J. Scientific Objectivity. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E. N.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, 2020).

67. Graves, J. L., Kearney, M., Barabino, G. & Malcom, S. Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2117831119 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

68. Haraway, D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem. Stud. 14, 575–599 (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

69. Haraway, D. J. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science (Routledge, 1989).

70. Longino, H. E. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry (Princeton Univ. Press, 1990).

71. Ruphy, S. Rôle des valeurs en science: contributions de la philosophie féministe des sciences. Écologie Politique 51, 41–54 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

72. D’Ignazio, C. & Klein, L. Introduction: Why Data Science Needs Feminism. Data Feminism https://data-feminism.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/frfa9szd (2020).

73. Kotcher, J. E., Myers, T. A., Vraga, E. K., Stenhouse, N. & Maibach, E. W. Does engagement in advocacy hurt the credibility of scientists? results from a randomized national survey experiment. Environ. Commun. 11, 415–429 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

74. Beall, L., Myers, T. A., Kotcher, J. E., Vraga, E. K. & Maibach, E. W. Controversy matters: impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates. PLoS ONE 12, e0187511 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

75. Cologna, V., Knutti, R., Oreskes, N. & Siegrist, M. Majority of German citizens, US citizens and climate scientists support policy advocacy by climate researchers and expect greater political engagement. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 024011 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

76. Foote, E. Circumstances affecting the heat of the Sun’s rays. Am. J. Sci. Arts 22, 383–384 (1856).

    Google Scholar 

77. Arrhenius, S. XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 41, 237–276 (1896).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

78. Manabe, S. & Wetherald, R. T. Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity. J. Atmos. Sci. 24, 241–259 (1967).

    <a data-track="click||click_references" rel="nofollow noopener" data-track-label="10.1175/1520-0469(1967)0242.0.CO;2″ data-track-item_id=”10.1175/1520-0469(1967)0242.0.CO;2″ data-track-value=”article reference” data-track-action=”article reference” href=”https://doi.org/10.1175%2F1520-0469%281967%29024%3C0241%3ATEOTAW%3E2.0.CO%3B2″ aria-label=”Article reference 78″ data-doi=”10.1175/1520-0469(1967)0242.0.CO;2″>Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

79. Keeling, C. D. et al. Atmospheric carbon dioxide variations at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. Tellus 28, 538–551 (1976).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

80. Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

81. Thomas, C. D. et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145–148 (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

82. Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., Moore, I., Köhler, J. & Le Quéré, C. Use of aviation by climate change researchers: structural influences, personal attitudes, and information provision. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102184 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

83. Higham, J. & Font, X. Decarbonising academia: confronting our climate hypocrisy. J. Sustain. Tour. 28, 1–9 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

84. Kadykalo, A. N. et al. Bridging research and practice in conservation. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1725–1737 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

85. Gardner, C. J. & Bullock, J. M. In the climate emergency, conservation must become survival ecology. Front. Conserv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.659912 (2021).

86. Cvitanovic, C., Hobday, A. J., van Kerkhoff, L. & Marshall, N. A. Overcoming barriers to knowledge exchange for adaptive resource management; the perspectives of Australian marine scientists. Mar. Policy 52, 38–44 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

87. Toomey, A. H. Why facts don’t change minds: Insights from cognitive science for the improved communication of conservation research. Biol. Conserv. 278, 109886 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

88. Toomey, A. H., Knight, A. T. & Barlow, J. Navigating the space between research and implementation in conservation. Conserv. Lett. 10, 619–625 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

89. Robinson, J. G. Conservation biology and real-world conservation. Conserv. Biol. 20, 658–669 (2006).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

90. Tree, I. Wilding (Picador, 2019).

91. Molnár, Z. et al. Social justice for traditional knowledge holders will help conserve Europe’s nature. Biol. Conserv. 285, 110190 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

92. Blanc, G. & Morisson, H. The Invention of Green Colonialism (Polity, 2022).

93. Miriti, M. N., Rawson, A. J. & Mansfield, B. The history of natural history and race: decolonizing human dimensions of ecology. Ecol. Appl. 33, e2748 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

94. Trisos, C. H., Auerbach, J. & Katti, M. Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1205–1212 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

95. Kauppi, P. & Sedjo, R. Technological and Economic Potential of Options to Enhance, Maintain, and Manage Biological Carbon Reservoirs and Geo-engineering (IPCC, 2001).

96. Fournier, T. & Lepiller, O. Se nourrir de promesses. Socio 12, 73–95 (2019).

97. Hickel, J. & Kallis, G. Is green growth possible? N. Political Econ. 25, 469–486 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

98. Dillet, B. & Hatzisavvidou, S. Beyond technofix: thinking with Epimetheus in the anthropocene. Contemp. Polit. Theory 21, 351–372 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

99. Sadler-Smith, E. & Akstinaite, V. Human hubris, anthropogenic climate change, and an environmental ethic of humility. Organ. Environ. 35, 446–467 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

100. Brigandt, I. & Love, A. Reductionism in Biology. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (eds. Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, 2023).

101. Weinberg, R. A. Coming full circle—from endless complexity to simplicity and back again. Cell 157, 267–271 (2014).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

102. Casadevall, A. & Fang, F. C. Specialized science. Infect. Immun. 82, 1355–1360 (2014).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

103. Rodríguez-Hernández, C. F., Cascallar, E. & Kyndt, E. Socio-economic status and academic performance in higher education: a systematic review. Educ. Res. Rev. 29, 100305 (2020).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

104. Gendron, Y. Constituting the academic performer: the spectre of superficiality and stagnation in academia. Eur. Account. Rev. 17, 97–127 (2008).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

105. Vitales, H. M. M. Foucault and beyond: from sovereignty power to contemporary biopolitics. Mabini Rev. 9, 161–178 (2020).

     Google Scholar 

106. Lemaitre, B. Science, narcissism and the quest for visibility. FEBS J. 284, 875–882 (2017).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

107. Blanchard, M., Bouchet-Valat, M., Cartron, D., Greffion, J. & Gros, J. Concerned yet polluting: a survey on French research personnel and climate change. PLOS Clim. 1, e0000070 (2022).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

108. Verplanken, B. & Whitmarsh, L. Habit and climate change. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 42, 42–46 (2021).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

109. Masson, T. & Fritsche, I. We need climate change mitigation and climate change mitigation needs the ‘we’: a state-of-the-art review of social identity effects motivating climate change action. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 42, 89–96 (2021).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

110. Cialdini, R. B. & Jacobson, R. P. Influences of social norms on climate change-related behaviors. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 42, 1–8 (2021).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

111. Venghaus, S., Henseleit, M. & Belka, M. The impact of climate change awareness on behavioral changes in Germany: changing minds or changing behavior? Energ. Sustain Soc. 12, 8 (2022).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

112. Chang, E. H. et al. The mixed effects of online diversity training. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7778–7783 (2019).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

113. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

114. Ecker, U. K. H. et al. The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1, 13–29 (2022).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

115. Bristow, W. Enlightenment. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (eds. Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, 2023).

116. Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G. & Fielding, K. S. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 622–626 (2016).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

117. Comby, J.-B. Dépolitisation du problème climatique: réformisme et rapports de classe. Idées Econ. Soc. 190, 20–27 (2017).

     Google Scholar 

118. Longuet-Higgins, C. For goodness sake. Nature 312, 204 (1984).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

119. Philippe, H. In Décroissance Versus Développement Durable. Débats Pour la Suite du Monde 166–186 (Écosociété, 2011).

120. Merchant, C. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution (Harper & Row, 1980).

121. Raffoul, A. W. Listen to the science! Which science? Regenerative research for times of planetary crises. Front. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1115238 (2023).

122. Ureta, S., Barandiaran, J., Salazar, M. & Torralbo, C. Strength out of weakness: Rethinking scientific engagement with the ecological crisis as strategic action. Elementa 11, 00072 (2023).

123. Thierry, A., Horn, L., von Hellermann, P. & Gardner, C. J. “No research on a dead planet”: preserving the socio-ecological conditions for academia. Front. Educ. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1237076 (2023).

124. Glavovic, B. C., Smith, T. F. & White, I. The tragedy of climate change science. Clim. Dev. 14, 829–833 (2022).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

125. Festinger, L. Cognitive dissonance. Sci. Am. 207, 93–106 (1962).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

126. Jacob, F. Evolution and tinkering. Science 196, 1161–1166 (1977).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

127. Capstick, S. et al. Civil disobedience by scientists helps press for urgent climate action. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 773–774 (2022).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

128. Nordhagen, S., Calverley, D., Foulds, C., O’Keefe, L. & Wang, X. Climate change research and credibility: balancing tensions across professional, personal, and public domains. Clim. Change 125, 149–162 (2014).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

129. Attari, S. Z., Krantz, D. H. & Weber, E. U. Statements about climate researchers’ carbon footprints affect their credibility and the impact of their advice. Clim. Change 138, 325–338 (2016).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

130. Cologna, V. et al. Trust in scientists and their role in society across 67 countries. Preprint at OSF Preprints https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6ay7s (2024).

131. Cornish, F. et al. Participatory action research. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 3, 34 (2023).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

132. Barnaud, C. & Van Paassen, A. Equity, power games, and legitimacy: dilemmas of participatory natural resource management. Ecol. Soc. 18, 21 (2013).

133. Richards, J. “Precious” metals: the case for treating metals as irreplaceable. J. Clean. Prod. 14, 324–333 (2006).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

134. Vlasceanu, M. et al. Addressing climate change with behavioral science: a global intervention tournament in 63 countries. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj5778 (2024).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

135. Barragan-Jason, G., Loreau, M., de Mazancourt, C., Singer, M. C. & Parmesan, C. Psychological and physical connections with nature improve both human well-being and nature conservation: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Biol. Conserv. 277, 109842 (2023).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

136. Nielsen, K. S. et al. Realizing the full potential of behavioural science for climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01951-1 (2024).

137. Morel Darleux, C. Là où le feu et l’ours (Libertalia, 2021).

138. Ben-Ari, T. How research can steer academia towards a low-carbon future. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 551–552 (2023).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

139. Macfarlane, A. R. et al. A call for funding bodies to influence the reduction of environmental impacts in remote scientific fieldwork. Front. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1338660 (2024).

140. Ivanova, D. et al. Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 093001 (2020).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

141. Rae, C. L., Farley, M., Jeffery, K. J. & Urai, A. E. Climate crisis and ecological emergency: why they concern (neuro)scientists, and what we can do. Brain Neurosci. Adv. 6, 23982128221075430 (2022).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

142. Vidal Valero, M. Outcry as scientists sanctioned for climate protest. Nature 614, 604–605 (2023).

     PubMed 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

143. Grossman, D. Scientists under arrest: the researchers taking action over climate change. Nature 626, 710–712 (2024).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

144. Zacharakis, A. L. & Meyer, G. D. A lack of insight: do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process? J. Bus. Venturing 13, 57–76 (1998).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

145. Transition bas carbone: un plan ambitieux pour le CNRS. CNRS https://www.cnrs.fr/fr/cnrsinfo/transition-bas-carbone-un-plan-ambitieux-pour-le-cnrs (14 November 2022).

146. Sarabipour, S. et al. Changing scientific meetings for the better. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 296–300 (2021).

     Article 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

147. Wynes, S., Donner, S. D., Tannason, S. & Nabors, N. Academic air travel has a limited influence on professional success. J. Clean. Prod. 226, 959–967 (2019).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

148. Le Quéré, C. et al. Towards a Culture of Low-Carbon Research for the 21st Century (Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, 2015).

149. Moran, D. et al. Quantifying the potential for consumer-oriented policy to reduce European and foreign carbon emissions. Clim. Policy 20, S28–S38 (2020).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

150. Moran, D. et al. Carbon footprints of 13 000 cities. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064041 (2018).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

151. Heede, R. Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Clim. Change 122, 229–241 (2014).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

152. Garnett, E. E. & Balmford, A. The vital role of organizations in protecting climate and nature. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 319–321 (2022).

     Article 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

153. Swain, D. Climate researchers need support to become scientist-communicators. Nature 624, 9 (2023).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

154. Glover, A., Strengers, Y. & Lewis, T. The unsustainability of academic aeromobility in Australian universities. Sustainability Sci. Pract. Policy 13, 1–12 (2017).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

155. Bonnéry, S. LAHIRE Bernard (dir.). Enfances de classe. De l’inégalité parmi les enfants. Paris: Éd. du Seuil, 2019, 1232 p. Rev. française de. pédagogie 205, 122–124 (2018).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

156. Lenton, T. M. et al. Operationalising positive tipping points towards global sustainability. Glob. Sustainability 5, e1 (2022).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

157. Nielsen, K. S., Nicholas, K. A., Creutzig, F., Dietz, T. & Stern, P. C. The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Energy 6, 1011–1016 (2021).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

158. Barros, B. & Wilk, R. The outsized carbon footprints of the super-rich. Sustainabilit Sci. Pract. Policy 17, 316–322 (2021).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

159. Attari, S. Z., Krantz, D. H. & Weber, E. U. Climate change communicators’ carbon footprints affect their audience’s policy support. Clim. Change 154, 529–545 (2019).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

160. Brown, M. B. Review of Roger S. Pielke, Jr., The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Minerva 46, 485–489 (2008).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

161. Latter, B. & Capstick, S. Climate emergency: UK universities’ declarations and their role in responding to climate change. Front. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.660596 (2021).

162. Knödlseder, J. et al. Estimate of the carbon footprint of astronomical research infrastructures. Nat. Astron 6, 503–513 (2022).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

Download references