Groves T. Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research. BMJ. 2008;337(7661): a718.
Google Scholar
Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med. 2010;8:24.
Google Scholar
Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8(1):2–10.
Google Scholar
Chan AW, Song F, Vickers A, Jefferson T, Dickersin K, Gøtzsche PC, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):257–66.
Google Scholar
Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):267–76.
Google Scholar
Kunath F, Grobe HR, Rücker G, Engehausen D, Antes G, Wullich B, et al. Do journals publishing in the field of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions. Urol Int. 2012;88(1):54–9.
Google Scholar
Sims MT, Henning NM, Wayant CC, Vassar M. Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of “Instructions for Authors.” Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):137.
Google Scholar
Wayant C, Smith C, Sims M, Vassar M. Hematology journals do not sufficiently adhere to reporting guidelines: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15(4):608–17.
Google Scholar
Checketts JX, Sims MT, Detweiler B, Middlemist K, Jones J, Vassar M. An evaluation of reporting guidelines and clinical trial registry requirements among orthopaedic surgery journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(3):e15.
Google Scholar
Sims MT, Checketts JX, Wayant C, Vassar M. Requirements for trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in critical care journals: a meta-epidemiological study of journals’ instructions for authors. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018;16(1):55–65.
Google Scholar
Sims MT, Bowers AM, Fernan JM, Dormire KD, Herrington JM, Vassar M. Trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in cardiovascular journals. Heart. 2018;104(9):753–9.
Google Scholar
Jorski A, Scott J, Heavener T, Vassar M. Reporting guideline and clinical trial registration requirements in gastroenterology and hepatology journals. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018;16(2):119–27.
Google Scholar
Cook C, Checketts JX, Atakpo P, Nelson N, Vassar M. How well are reporting guidelines and trial registration used by dermatology journals to limit bias? A meta-epidemiological study. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(6):1433–4.
Google Scholar
Wayant C, Moore G, Hoelscher M, Cook C, Vassar M. Adherence to reporting guidelines and clinical trial registration policies in oncology journals: a cross-sectional review. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(3):104–10.
Google Scholar
Sharp MK, Tokalić R, Gómez G, Wager E, Altman DG, Hren D. A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;107:42–50.
Google Scholar
Zuñiga-Hernandez JA, Dorsey-Treviño EG, González-González JG, Brito JP, Montori VM, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R. Endorsement of reporting guidelines and study registration by endocrine and internal medicine journals: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ Open. 2091;9(9):e031259.
Zhou J, Li J, Zhang J, Geng B, Chen Y, Zhou X. Requirements for study registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in surgery journals: a cross-sectional study. World J Surg. 2021;45(4):1031–42.
Google Scholar
Zhou J, Li J, Zhang J, Geng B, Chen Y, Zhou X. The relationship between endorsing reporting guidelines or trial registration and the impact factor or total citations in surgical journals. PeerJ. 2022;10: e12837.
Google Scholar
Duan Y, Zhao L, Ma Y, Luo J, Chen J, Miao J, et al. A cross-sectional study of the endorsement proportion of reporting guidelines in 1039 Chinese medical journals. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023;23(1):20.
Google Scholar
Stevens A, Shamseer L, Weinstein E, Yazdi F, Turner L, Thielman J, et al. Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals’ endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review. BMJ. 2014;348: g3804.
Google Scholar
Stahl AC, Tietz AS, Dewey M, Kendziora B. Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? Insights Imaging. 2023;14(1):85.
Google Scholar
Stahl AC, Tietz AS, Kendziora B, Dewey M. Has the STARD statement improved the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in European Radiology? Eur Radiol. 2023;33(1):97–105.
Google Scholar
Park HY, Suh CH, Woo S, Kim PH, Kim KW. Quality reporting of systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines: results from recently published papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology. Korean J Radiol. 2022;23(3):355–69.
Google Scholar
Grégory J, Maino C, Vilgrain V, Ronot M, Boutron I. Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials assessing interventional radiology for liver disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023;1576–1583.e7.
Dewey M, Levine D, Bossuyt PM, Kressel HY. Impact and perceived value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology authors and reviewers. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(8):3986–95.
Google Scholar
Mollura DJ, Culp MP, Pollack E. Artificial intelligence in low- and middle-income countries: innovating global health radiology. Radiology. 2020;297(3):513–20.
Google Scholar
Daye D, Wiggins WF, Lungren MP, Alkasab T, Kottler N, Allen B, et al. Implementation of clinical artificial intelligence in radiology: who decides and how? Radiology. 2022;305(3):555–63.
Google Scholar
Strohm L, Hehakaya C, Ranschaert ER, Boon WPC, Moors EHM. Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in radiology: hindering and facilitating factors. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(10):5525–32.
Google Scholar
Scheek D, Rezazade Mehrizi MH, Ranschaert E. Radiologists in the loop: the roles of radiologists in the development of AI applications. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(10):7960–8.
Google Scholar
Yang L, Ene IC, Arabi Belaghi R, Koff D, Stein N, Santaguida PL. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in radiology: a scoping review. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(3):1477–95.
Google Scholar
Shelmerdine SC, Arthurs OJ, Denniston A, Sebire NJ. Review of study reporting guidelines for clinical studies using artificial intelligence in healthcare. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021;28(1): e100385.
Google Scholar
Ibrahim H, Liu X, Denniston AK. Reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence in healthcare research. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;49(5):470–6.
Google Scholar
Meshaka R, Pinto Dos Santos D, Arthurs OJ, Sebire NJ, Shelmerdine SC. Artificial intelligence reporting guidelines: what the pediatric radiologist needs to know. Pediatr Radiol. 2022;52(11):2101–2110.
Zrubka Z, Gulácsi L, Péntek M. Time to start using checklists for reporting artificial intelligence in health care and biomedical research: a rapid review of available tools. 2022 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering System. August 12–15, 2022. Crete, Greece. https://doi.org/10.1109/INES56734.2022.9922639. Accessed 15 Jul 2023.
Klontzas ME, Gatti AA, Tejani AS, Kahn CE Jr. AI reporting guidelines: how to select the best one for your research. Radiol Artif Intell. 2023;5(3): e230055.
Google Scholar
Ioannidis JP, Fanelli D, Dunne DD, Goodman SN. Meta-research: Evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biol. 2015;13(10): e1002264.
Google Scholar
Tatsioni A, Ioannidis JPA. Meta-research: bird’s eye views of primary care research. Fam Pract. 2020;37(3):287–9.
Google Scholar
Krnic Martinic M, Pieper D, Glatt A, Puljak L. Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):203.
Google Scholar
Puljak L, Makaric ZL, Buljan I, Pieper D. What is a meta-epidemiological study? Analysis of published literature indicated heterogeneous study designs and definitions. J Comp Eff Res. 2020;9(7):497–508.
Google Scholar
Mbuagbaw L, Lawson DO, Puljak L, Allison DB, Thabane L. A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):226.
Google Scholar
Kolaski K, Logan LR, Ioannidis JPA. Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2023;12(1):96.
Google Scholar
Clarivate. Journal Citation Reports. https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr. Accessed 20 Jul 2023.
Frank RA, McInnes MDF, Levine D, Kressel HY, Jesurum JS, Petrcich W, et al. Are study and journal characteristics reliable indicators of “truth” in imaging research? Radiology. 2018;287(1):215–23.
Google Scholar
Baek S, Yoon DY, Lim KJ, Cho YK, Seo YL, Yun EJ. The most downloaded and most cited articles in radiology journals: a comparative bibliometric analysis. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(11):4832–8.
Google Scholar
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):726–732.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573–577.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71.
Google Scholar
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.
Google Scholar
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, et al; STARD Group. STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology. 2015;277(3):826–832.
Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):55–63.
Google Scholar
Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D; CARE Group. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep 2013;2013:bcr2013201554.
Brouwers MC, Kerkvliet K, Spithoff K; AGREE Next Steps Consortium. The AGREE reporting checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016;352:i1152.
Chen Y, Yang K, Marušic A, Qaseem A, Meerpohl JJ, Flottorp S, Akl EA, et al. RIGHT (Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare) Working Group. A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(2):128–132.
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51.
Google Scholar
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.
Google Scholar
Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(7):e3000410.
Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986–992.
Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, de Bekker-Grob E, Briggs AH, Carswell C, et al; CHEERS 2022 ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. BMJ. 2022;376:e067975.
Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(10):e537-e548.
Cruz Rivera S, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(10):e549-e560.
Lekadir K, Feragen A, Fofanah AJ, Frangi A, Buyx A, Emrlie A, et al. FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare. arXiv:2309.12325v1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12325. Accessed 10 Oct 2023.
Norgeot B, Quer G, Beaulieu-Jones BK, Torkamani A, Dias R, Gianfrancesco M, et al. Minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modeling: the MI-CLAIM checklist. Nat Med. 2020;26(9):1320–4.
Google Scholar
Hernandez-Boussard T, Bozkurt S, Ioannidis JPA, Shah NH. MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): Developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(12):2011–5.
Google Scholar
Mongan J, Moy L, Kahn CE Jr. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): a guide for authors and reviewers. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020;2(2): e200029.
Google Scholar
Cerdá-Alberich L, Solana J, Mallol P, Ribas G, García-Junco M, Alberich-Bayarri A, et al. MAIC-10 brief quality checklist for publications using artificial intelligence and medical images. Insights Imaging. 2023;14(1):11.
Google Scholar
Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(12):749–62.
Google Scholar
Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, Aerts HJWL, Andrearczyk V, Apte A, et al. The image biomarker standardization initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology. 2020;295(2):328–38.
Google Scholar
Kocak B, Baessler B, Bakas S, Cuocolo R, Fedorov A, Maier-Hein L, et al. CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII. Insights Imaging. 2023;14(1):75.
Google Scholar
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network. https://www.equator-network.org. Accessed 10 Oct 2023.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors document. https://www.icmje.org. Accessed 10 Oct 2023.
Mangiafico. An R companion for the handbook of biological statistics, version 1.3.9, revised 2023. https://rcompanion.org/rcompanion/. Accessed 20 Jul 2023.
Mangiafico SS. Summary and analysis of extension program evaluation in R, version 1.20.05, revised 2023. rcompanion.org/handbook/. Accessed 10 Oct 2023.
The R Project for Statistical Computing. R language version 4.1.3. https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 20 Jul 2023.
Posit. within RStudio version 1.4.1106. https://posit.co. Accessed 10 Oct 2023.
Park JE, Kim D, Kim HS, Park SY, Kim JY, Cho SJ, et al. Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(1):523–36.
Google Scholar
Zhong J, Hu Y, Si L, Jia G, Xing Y, Zhang H, et al. A systematic review of radiomics in osteosarcoma: utilizing radiomics quality score as a tool promoting clinical translation. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(3):1526–35.
Google Scholar
Zhong J, Hu Y, Zhang G, Xing Y, Ding D, Ge X, et al. An updated systematic review of radiomics in osteosarcoma: utilizing CLAIM to adapt the increasing trend of deep learning application in radiomics. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):138.
Google Scholar
Zhong J, Hu Y, Ge X, Xing Y, Ding D, Zhang G, et al. A systematic review of radiomics in chondrosarcoma: assessment of study quality and clinical value needs handy tools. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(2):1433–44.
Google Scholar
Zhong J, Xing Y, Zhang G, Hu Y, Ding D, Ge X, et al. A systematic review of radiomics in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): the potential of analysis on individual radiomics feature for identifying genuine promising imaging biomarkers. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):414.
Google Scholar
Zhong J, Hu Y, Xing Y, Ge X, Ding D, Zhang H, et al. A systematic review of radiomics in pancreatitis: applying the evidence level rating tool for promoting clinical transferability. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):139.
Google Scholar
O’Shea RJ, Sharkey AR, Cook GJR, Goh V. Systematic review of research design and reporting of imaging studies applying convolutional neural networks for radiological cancer diagnosis. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(10):7969–83.
Google Scholar
Si L, Zhong J, Huo J, Xuan K, Zhuang Z, Hu Y, et al. Deep learning in knee imaging: a systematic review utilizing a Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM). Eur Radiol. 2022;32(2):1353–61.
Google Scholar
Kocak B, Keles A, Akinci DT. Self-reporting with checklists in artificial intelligence research on medical imaging: a systematic review based on citations of CLAIM. Eur Radiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10243-9.
Google Scholar
Sivanesan U, Wu K, McInnes MDF, Dhindsa K, Salehi F, van der Pol CB. Checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging reporting adherence in peer-reviewed and preprint manuscripts with the highest altmetric attention scores: a meta-research study. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023;74(2):334–42.
Google Scholar
Mannocci A, Saulle R, Colamesta V, D’Aguanno S, Giraldi G, Maffongelli E, et al. What is the impact of reporting guidelines on public health journals in Europe? The case of STROBE CONSORT and PRISMA. J Public Health (Oxf). 2015;37(4):737–40.
Google Scholar
Dal Santo T, Rice DB, Amiri LSN, Tasleem A, Li K, Boruff JT, et al. Methods and results of studies on reporting guideline adherence are poorly reported: a meta-research study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023;159:225–34.
Google Scholar
Blanco D, Altman D, Moher D, Boutron I, Kirkham JJ, Cobo E. Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5): e026589.
Google Scholar
Barnes C, Boutron I, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2015;13:221.
Google Scholar
Koletsi D, Fleming PS, Behrents RG, Lynch CD, Pandis N. The use of tailored subheadings was successful in enhancing compliance with CONSORT in a dental journal. J Dent. 2017;67:66–71.
Google Scholar
Sounderajah V, Ashrafian H, Golub RM, Shetty S, De Fauw J, Hooft L, et al; STARD-AI Steering Committee. Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e047709.
Collins GS, Dhiman P, Andaur Navarro CL, Ma J, Hooft L, et al. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7): e048008.
Google Scholar
Sounderajah V, Ashrafian H, Rose S, Shah NH, Ghassemi M, Golub R, et al. A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI. Nat Med. 2021;27(10):1663–5.
Google Scholar
Olczak J, Pavlopoulos J, Prijs J, Ijpma FFA, Doornberg JN, Lundström C, et al. Presenting artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning studies to clinicians and healthcare stakeholders: an introductory reference with a guideline and a Clinical AI Research (CAIR) checklist proposal. Acta Orthop. 2021;92(5):513–25.
Google Scholar
Vasey B, Nagendran M, Campbell B, Clifton DA, Collins GS, Denaxas S, et al; DECIDE-AI expert group. Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. Nat Med. 2022;28(5):924–933.